Vacuum Check Valve Repair
#51
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 3,887
From: Silicon Valley
MY'14 W212 M276 3.5NA @60kMi
$10 upgrade... done! ✌️
Rather than suffering check valves issues, how about cancelling that problem at once ?
AMZ Prime $3Ea. selected check valve
A simple replumb of your vacuum rubber line at the vaccum pump output...
Add a "T" fitting plus two check valves connected to old outlet without original membrane.
-- One valve connected pressure release valve.
-- One valve connected as vacuum check valve.
This should effectively protect your vacuum circuit from the high crankcase blow-by pressure that explode undersized OEM part.
The real best fix is to minimize piston-rings blow-by with proper oiling circulation, you know piston squerter pressure.
AMZ Prime $3Ea. selected check valve
A simple replumb of your vacuum rubber line at the vaccum pump output...
Add a "T" fitting plus two check valves connected to old outlet without original membrane.
-- One valve connected pressure release valve.
-- One valve connected as vacuum check valve.
This should effectively protect your vacuum circuit from the high crankcase blow-by pressure that explode undersized OEM part.
The real best fix is to minimize piston-rings blow-by with proper oiling circulation, you know piston squerter pressure.
Last edited by CaliBenzDriver; 02-07-2024 at 02:26 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by CaliBenzDriver:
alpinaturbo (10-13-2024),
Mitsuturbo (02-07-2024)
#52
Super Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 854
Likes: 300
From: Fleriduh
W212 E63S Wagon - GSL580 - E63 - E350 - C300
#53
Super Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 854
Likes: 300
From: Fleriduh
W212 E63S Wagon - GSL580 - E63 - E350 - C300
The following users liked this post:
Yakatak (02-07-2024)
#54
At $300 and what could possibly wind up being an almost annual replacement due to a failed 12mm round bit of silicone, it's a tough pill to swallow. I'm sure if you're doing your own work, it's not exactly cost prohibitive. Pretty sure it's at minimum a $1000 bill at the dealer, though.
Can't argue against OEM in most cases, but the check valve is a weak point that fails often. As little as 25k miles, on the C43's I've seen.
There's a better way. To do it 100% correctly, it would be best to test a known good check valve for opening pressure/vacuum. Certainly not difficult to figure out.
Can't argue against OEM in most cases, but the check valve is a weak point that fails often. As little as 25k miles, on the C43's I've seen.
There's a better way. To do it 100% correctly, it would be best to test a known good check valve for opening pressure/vacuum. Certainly not difficult to figure out.
The following users liked this post:
OldManAndHisCar (02-07-2024)
The following 4 users liked this post by OldManAndHisCar:
#56
Mitsu - good idea in theory, however, we are talking tiny variations in BAR here to actuate the waste gates. I have had turbo cars for ever....never have I had one nearly as hot as the 5.5, the 4.0 from what I have seen is even hotter. While there are many theories as to a better way to skin this or that cat - I can tell you from my "Mitsubishi" days....I had a (aging myself)....Blix SBC Id boost controller on DR650 turbos...I had to change the vacuum lines to route a gReddy(?) BOV - anything out of the ordinary on that vacuum line and things went bad, fast.
Last edited by Mitsuturbo; 02-09-2024 at 10:12 AM.
The following users liked this post:
JettaRed (10-10-2024)
#57
That stupid valve !
Thanks for this thread. I just replaced this valve with a $10 ebay valve.
2019 C43, M276, stock-stock no tune. 140k miles, I'm getting ready to do the spark plugs a second time. Car is kept up, mostly highway miles at speed, no drag racing.
Drove inconsistently at lower speeds....occasional lack of response around town. No code, no CE lights.
Read up, and replaced the valve.....at least on M276 you'll need a short torx screwdriver, the dipstick blocks straight access. Otherwise uncomplicated.
No photo, but the top came out, the bottom was picked out of the hole, and the diaphragm was not to be found.
All the "bobbles" are gone, it drives well again, especially off idle.
What a bizarre thing to have fail, and cause such significant issues.....
While Benz doesn't list it as a part number, I find it interesting this valve is a commodity part and they make it a one screw fix......this should probably be replaced every time you replace spark plugs and done as routine....the whole car's feel depends on a $1 valve at OE cost ?????
This car has a mostly useless boost gage, no numbers. I am happy to see that it definitely is showing more boost, even if a useless unlabled color gage.
2019 C43, M276, stock-stock no tune. 140k miles, I'm getting ready to do the spark plugs a second time. Car is kept up, mostly highway miles at speed, no drag racing.
Drove inconsistently at lower speeds....occasional lack of response around town. No code, no CE lights.
Read up, and replaced the valve.....at least on M276 you'll need a short torx screwdriver, the dipstick blocks straight access. Otherwise uncomplicated.
No photo, but the top came out, the bottom was picked out of the hole, and the diaphragm was not to be found.
All the "bobbles" are gone, it drives well again, especially off idle.
What a bizarre thing to have fail, and cause such significant issues.....
While Benz doesn't list it as a part number, I find it interesting this valve is a commodity part and they make it a one screw fix......this should probably be replaced every time you replace spark plugs and done as routine....the whole car's feel depends on a $1 valve at OE cost ?????
This car has a mostly useless boost gage, no numbers. I am happy to see that it definitely is showing more boost, even if a useless unlabled color gage.
Last edited by speedlaw; 06-05-2024 at 01:16 PM. Reason: mileage is important !
The following users liked this post:
CaliBenzDriver (06-05-2024)
#58
Super Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 854
Likes: 300
From: Fleriduh
W212 E63S Wagon - GSL580 - E63 - E350 - C300
Not long ago I helped a buddy put an eBay kit onto his E350 (3.5). About a month later we did it again....with parts from mboemparts.com. With the ebay ones he got what he paid for....
#59
I didn't have any luck with the three el cheapo check valves purchased from AliExpress.. one was faulty on arrival and the other two leaked oil from the O-ring.
Now running the original factory check valve with the diaphragm from one of the Chinese parts. Seems to be working well.
Now running the original factory check valve with the diaphragm from one of the Chinese parts. Seems to be working well.
#60
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 698
04 E55 AMG (totaled), 07 S550 4Matic, 14 E63S
Mine does this but only when warm (the oil I mean, not the coolant, my oil takes 12 minutes to warm up in the summer and more like 17 in the winter, because E63S I guess). I replaced my check valve assembly with the more expensive one from Ukraine last year. So last night I pulled it out to examine and it is perfect. It holds a vacuum in the suck direction but passes in the blow direction. The one I pulled off the car last year was also fine but I think the whole vacuum pump is not original (prior owner).
#61
Installed another cheapo valve today, my replacement failed (was disassembled on removal), there was some oil in the line. Will be checking for oil in the line (no need to remove the valve), have another one standing by just in case
#62
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 4,719
From: Jakarta-Indonesia
2014 - W212.065 - E400 ( M276.820, 3 liter Turbo) RWD not Hybrid
.
I bought the Amazon one like 6 months ago, as back up, but never use it yet.
It seems there is a slight difference between Ukaraine Klifex to the China Amazon.
.
Below :
# 1 = It seems the Klifex has plastic material at the middle of the star shaped opening, while the China one has none.
#2 = I seems the Klifex silicone membrane maybe a tiny tiny bit wider diameter than China one.
#3 = If I were to use the China one someday, I will power glue the black round membrane holder to the check valve body. The silicone membrane is thick enough to be robust, I believe so.
What I think can fail is the black round membrane holder which is only friction fit into check valve body, slipped out of its parking position and then hell broke loose.
If say the membrane dot lock get cut, that is another failure point. I mean the membrane sits and lock itself to the black round membrane holder is also a friction fit of a rather fat membrane
dot, as a lock....but this dot does not do much work actually.
I suggest try the power/crazy glue to secure the black round plastic membrane holder to valve body when you have the China one or even the Klifex one.
I bought the Amazon one like 6 months ago, as back up, but never use it yet.
It seems there is a slight difference between Ukaraine Klifex to the China Amazon.
.
Below :
# 1 = It seems the Klifex has plastic material at the middle of the star shaped opening, while the China one has none.
#2 = I seems the Klifex silicone membrane maybe a tiny tiny bit wider diameter than China one.
#3 = If I were to use the China one someday, I will power glue the black round membrane holder to the check valve body. The silicone membrane is thick enough to be robust, I believe so.
What I think can fail is the black round membrane holder which is only friction fit into check valve body, slipped out of its parking position and then hell broke loose.
If say the membrane dot lock get cut, that is another failure point. I mean the membrane sits and lock itself to the black round membrane holder is also a friction fit of a rather fat membrane
dot, as a lock....but this dot does not do much work actually.
I suggest try the power/crazy glue to secure the black round plastic membrane holder to valve body when you have the China one or even the Klifex one.
The following users liked this post:
PeterUbers (07-26-2024)
#63
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 2,224
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Checked mine; original part with 46k miles on the engine. I can blow through the hose side no problem but when I suck air from that side it's sealed and no air passes. Seems it's doing it's job correctly
fully intact, and I have no performance issues
fully intact, and I have no performance issues
Last edited by PeterUbers; 07-26-2024 at 12:02 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by PeterUbers:
CaliBenzDriver (07-27-2024),
jcarsnz (07-26-2024)
#64
Super Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 669
Likes: 484
From: Long Island ny
2007 e350 sport. 2010 350 4matic sport. Worlds first W212 E63R self built.
Something I did a while back . And reduced the amount of oil in the check valve by almost 80%. That 1" distance was enough to keep the oil that comes out of the pump away from the check valve . I used a more rigid vacuum hose to attach the new check valve to the old. I gutted the old check valve so it was free flowing but still snapped back in place the rubber guard that holds the rubber in place. . The new check valve is from a Volvo s90 if I can remember clearly because it was so long ago. But it was slightly bigger because I remember I was able to blow through the one way direction easier then the factory one. So far it's been over a year and works perfectly
The following 3 users liked this post by Cifdig:
#65
Out Of Control!!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 12,160
Likes: 2,224
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Something I did a while back . And reduced the amount of oil in the check valve by almost 80%. That 1" distance was enough to keep the oil that comes out of the pump away from the check valve . I used a more rigid vacuum hose to attach the new check valve to the old. I gutted the old check valve so it was free flowing but still snapped back in place the rubber guard that holds the rubber in place. . The new check valve is from a Volvo s90 if I can remember clearly because it was so long ago. But it was slightly bigger because I remember I was able to blow through the one way direction easier then the factory one. So far it's been over a year and works perfectly
The following 2 users liked this post by PeterUbers:
mbwillgrubs (07-29-2024),
san40 (07-29-2024)
#66
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 3,887
From: Silicon Valley
MY'14 W212 M276 3.5NA @60kMi
T in a pressure vent to preserve vacuum
The diaphragm killer is when crankcase pressure overcomes vacuum... then check valve gets pushed inward then blown back out by line pressure that should have never entered.
Wastegates should not get filled with pumped oil.
solid material - link.
So on turbo application your best bet is having a T to sort out vacuum from pressure coming out if pump.
One check valve vents positive pressure OUT and second holds oil-free vacuum down the line.
Wastegates should not get filled with pumped oil.
solid material - link.
So on turbo application your best bet is having a T to sort out vacuum from pressure coming out if pump.
One check valve vents positive pressure OUT and second holds oil-free vacuum down the line.
The following users liked this post:
alpinaturbo (10-13-2024)
#67
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,436
Likes: 2,031
From: Maryland, United States
2015 SL400 (M276 Turbo), 2014 C350 Sport (M276 NA), 2004 SL500 (M113), 2004 Audi TT225 (BEA)
#68
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 5,436
Likes: 2,031
From: Maryland, United States
2015 SL400 (M276 Turbo), 2014 C350 Sport (M276 NA), 2004 SL500 (M113), 2004 Audi TT225 (BEA)
The nice thing about the wastegate actuators on these cars is that any sort of fault will generally result in the gate being opened wide, as the actuators are absolutely not opened by boost. Rather, they're held shut by vacuum. If the line comes off or loses vacuum, the gates open by default. The mitsubishi way, as i'm sure you know, is for the actuator to default to the closed position by way of spring pressure. Our AMG actuators default to the open position by way of spring pressure.