Dyno results (large images attached)
10-22-2002, 03:32 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Clarksville, MD
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG, CLK 320
Dyno results (large images attached)
Had my car dynoed after installing the ecu and pulley kit. Unfortunately I didn't get the before dyno for a comparison.
I am pleased with the seat of the pants results. Driveability is good, throttle response is quicker. Happy about no more top speed governor
I am pleased with the seat of the pants results. Driveability is good, throttle response is quicker. Happy about no more top speed governor
10-22-2002, 07:13 PM
#2
3rd gear?
Jon, Thanks for sharing your data.
Apparently 3rd gear is the best gear to dyno in, smoothest and most indicative of power.
Your data looks like it correlates very well to another Renntech chart I saw (SLK32, but same motor and mods).
Was your car cool when tested? What was the weather like outside that day? Congrats!
Apparently 3rd gear is the best gear to dyno in, smoothest and most indicative of power.
Your data looks like it correlates very well to another Renntech chart I saw (SLK32, but same motor and mods).
Was your car cool when tested? What was the weather like outside that day? Congrats!
10-22-2002, 07:33 PM
#4
MBWorld Fanatic!
I hope your numbers are down due too the intercooler being heat soaked at those higher boost levels. It looks like something is wrong because the HP numbers begin tailing off after 4500rpm. My stock dyno chart shows a more straight line from bottom to top. If this is supposed to be true on yours it would produce another 20-30hp to the wheels.
My stock dyno is 294hp before the car was broken in. It is probably more now.
My stock dyno is 294hp before the car was broken in. It is probably more now.
10-22-2002, 08:02 PM
#5
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zeppelin
I hope your numbers are down due too the intercooler being heat soaked at those higher boost levels. It looks like something is wrong because the HP numbers begin tailing off after 4500rpm. My stock dyno chart shows a more straight line from bottom to top. If this is supposed to be true on yours it would produce another 20-30hp to the wheels.
My stock dyno is 294hp before the car was broken in. It is probably more now.
I hope your numbers are down due too the intercooler being heat soaked at those higher boost levels. It looks like something is wrong because the HP numbers begin tailing off after 4500rpm. My stock dyno chart shows a more straight line from bottom to top. If this is supposed to be true on yours it would produce another 20-30hp to the wheels.
My stock dyno is 294hp before the car was broken in. It is probably more now.
10-22-2002, 08:51 PM
#6
Jon: It is always good idea to do a baseline. Of ten C32s that we ran stock, HP ranges from 270 to 297. So now there is no way to tell what the actual gain is.
Our C32 makes 297HP and 290 ft.lbs. of TQ with just pulleys and Stage I IC upgrade, on 91 octane. See R&D #4 post below. It desparately needs more timing to smooth the curves out. Also we always run cars through the gears, as it is more representative of street driving.
Our C32 makes 297HP and 290 ft.lbs. of TQ with just pulleys and Stage I IC upgrade, on 91 octane. See R&D #4 post below. It desparately needs more timing to smooth the curves out. Also we always run cars through the gears, as it is more representative of street driving.
10-22-2002, 09:43 PM
#7
thats FU*KED up C32's from 270 to 297?!?!?! thats a pretty BIG diffrence!!!
what the hell can make such a diffrence? obviously at least 1 AMG worker there SUCKS and one knows whats up.
what the hell can make such a diffrence? obviously at least 1 AMG worker there SUCKS and one knows whats up.
Trending Topics
10-22-2002, 10:02 PM
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07 SL550; C32 (sold)
Originally posted by ro0zy
thats FU*KED up C32's from 270 to 297?!?!?! thats a pretty BIG diffrence!!!
what the hell can make such a diffrence? obviously at least 1 AMG worker there SUCKS and one knows whats up.
thats FU*KED up C32's from 270 to 297?!?!?! thats a pretty BIG diffrence!!!
what the hell can make such a diffrence? obviously at least 1 AMG worker there SUCKS and one knows whats up.
10-23-2002, 02:23 PM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Clarksville, MD
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C32 AMG, CLK 320
I ran the 1/4 mile with the car in stock trim, except for wheels and tires.
ET 1/4 Mile 13.4833
Speed 105.8397
60 ft 5.7518
1/8 mile 11.3349
Capitol Raceway
Crofton, Maryland
2-24-02
ET 1/4 Mile 13.4833
Speed 105.8397
60 ft 5.7518
1/8 mile 11.3349
Capitol Raceway
Crofton, Maryland
2-24-02
