17" AMG Winter Wheels for C55 Update
http://www.tirerack.com/wheels/Displ...2FMachined+Lip
In follow up conversations with Brian at TireRack, he assured me that the the C32 stock wheel would NOT fit the C55 calipers up front and that the "203 5 spoke" was the only 17" AMG wheel that would work.
Good news is that they look fine (not as nice as the C32 wheel) but still very nice and they cost 20% less.
Sorry for the confusion>>>>I guess I was the test case.
I'll post some pics later in the weekend
I am really liking the 203/5 spoke the more and more every day. Everything happens for a reason and in this case it all worked out. It is going to be a lot easier to keep clean through the winter as well.
Rgds,
Norm
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Rgds,
Norm
F: 18x7.5, 30mm
R: 18x8.5, 34mm
The owner's manual also states 17x7.5 37mm wheels for winter driving.
F: 18x7.5, 30mm
R: 18x8.5, 34mm
The owner's manual also states 17x7.5 37mm wheels for winter driving.
Rgds,
Norm
Last edited by noka; Nov 29, 2004 at 11:34 PM.
I'll have my wheels off this week i hope. I will check the offset on it. I will also measure that for you if i remember.

Assuming your C230 is an '05,
F: 17x7.5 36mm
R: 17x8.5 34mm
I also have the specs(from someone else on the board) for an '04 CLK55 when it had 17" wheels as stock:
F: 17x7.5 37mm
R: 17x8.5 34mm
I checked cuz I would prefer to get the 17" AMG Double Spoke 209 model.
Assuming your C230 is an '05,
F: 17x7.5 36mm
R: 17x8.5 34mm
I dont have a C230 anymore. I have a C55. :p I am only checking the offset for the wheels (which now thanks to you i know is in the manual) and measuring for smgc32 because i know he has been wanting to know the difference in height between the C55 and C32.
Assuming your C230 is an '05,
F: 17x7.5 36mm
R: 17x8.5 34mm
I also have the specs(from someone else on the board) for an '04 CLK55 when it had 17" wheels as stock:
F: 17x7.5 37mm
R: 17x8.5 34mm
I checked cuz I would prefer to get the 17" AMG Double Spoke 209 model.
Rgds,
Norm
Stock C55: front = ET30, rear = ET34 according to above post.
The C55's front wheels have been pushed out towards the outer fender by 7mm. Both cars utilize a 7.5" rim width with the same size sectional width tire, therefore one could state that the total increase in track is 14mm, not 10mm as stated by the MB literature. Where is the descrepancy of 4mm. Is it possible that the C55 has shorter control arms and spindles by 4mm over the C32 due to the grafting of the CLK front end? Interesting...
and how long have I been here with the correct info ????
jury is not out .... they fit (period)
and by the way, the wheel linked in the first post isn't even the OE C32 wheel
I am double checking on Friday by actually fitting the wheel to my vehicle, but I think I finally found the winner.
Tirerack doesn't seem to have these (except in 18" fitments) and the 18" fitments they do have have the same offset specs as the 17" fitments.
Since the front end of the CLK makes up the front end of the C55, I think it will work. I got them for about half off even though they are brand new. They were dealer take offs. The guy didn't like them. This happens a lot more than people think and I didn't have to ebay or anything.
I have looked a long time and have considered everything from dealer take-offs to the tirerack to custom rims, but none of them impressed me. They all felt like a bit of a compromise. Either they were cheap, but didn't look so hot, or were way to expensive for what they were and looked pretty good. These (to my taste) look great and can be had at a good dealerships on the cheap.
Since sub-32 degree temperatures are pretty short here and there isn't much snow or ice...shelling out ~1500 bucks for wheels plus ~800 for tires didn't make much sense.
I could have a kleeman limited slip for very close to that price.
Also, is the difference in offset between the OE C55 and OE C32 wheel significant in any way (i.e. will it look a bit odd or require a spacer to correct)?
I look forward to your guidance on the issue.
Rgds,
Norm
Rgds,
Norm





