MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
I think there is 5 speedways/tracks within 2 hours from San francisco.
Someone please do a track day
Sacramento Raceway would maybe be another good option because it is hardly ever crowded and you can get a few runs in. It's only downfall is track prep, which is easily overcome with MT or hoosiers though Originally Posted by sighting
I saw that and was tempted, but 4 hours each way is a bit long. The wife wont be up for that and i would love to bring her along.I think there is 5 speedways/tracks within 2 hours from San francisco.
Someone please do a track day

Quote:
Is Sacramento faster than Infineon?Originally Posted by MB_Forever
Sacramento Raceway would maybe be another good option because it is hardly ever crowded and you can get a few runs in. It's only downfall is track prep, which is easily overcome with MT or hoosiers though
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
They both have about the same elevation but Infineon usually experiences more head wind (sometimes cross winds) which tend to slow it down a bit. More important though is the fact that at Infineon, you will not be able to make too many runs: maybe 2 to 3 for the whole night. It is usually always crowded. Don't get me wrong, Infineon is a much bigger, much better, and much more maintained and up-kept track than Sacramento ever will be, but it's just always crowded. At Sacramento, you can run as many times as you want. They're only downfall is track prep tends to be horrible for street tires. And I mean really freakin bad.... Originally Posted by sighting
Is Sacramento faster than Infineon?

Track speeds at Sacramento have been a little controversial around here. You can probably read more about it in the W211 section across a few threads. Basically, since the big accident at Sacramento a couple of years ago, they apparently had to re-set their measuring equipment for the trap speeds and it is said that they've set the beams closer together than they "should" be, which as a result, ends up reading 2 to 3 mph higher than they should. This has been verified by different members cars and by VBox data. However, NHRA still runs big events there and they don't seem to have a problem with it, so hey.... we won't mind the extra boost either

Quote:

Track speeds at Sacramento have been a little controversial around here. You can probably read more about it in the W211 section across a few threads. Basically, since the big accident at Sacramento a couple of years ago, they apparently had to re-set their measuring equipment for the trap speeds and it is said that they've set the beams closer together than they "should" be, which as a result, ends up reading 2 to 3 mph higher than they should. This has been verified by different members cars and by VBox data. However, NHRA still runs big events there and they don't seem to have a problem with it, so hey.... we won't mind the extra boost either
Lets start a new thread to see who is up for sacramento run in the next 2 weeks or so before the rains come. Originally Posted by MB_Forever
They both have about the same elevation but Infineon usually experiences more head wind (sometimes cross winds) which tend to slow it down a bit. More important though is the fact that at Infineon, you will not be able to make too many runs: maybe 2 to 3 for the whole night. It is usually always crowded. Don't get me wrong, Infineon is a much bigger, much better, and much more maintained and up-kept track than Sacramento ever will be, but it's just always crowded. At Sacramento, you can run as many times as you want. They're only downfall is track prep tends to be horrible for street tires. And I mean really freakin bad.... 
Track speeds at Sacramento have been a little controversial around here. You can probably read more about it in the W211 section across a few threads. Basically, since the big accident at Sacramento a couple of years ago, they apparently had to re-set their measuring equipment for the trap speeds and it is said that they've set the beams closer together than they "should" be, which as a result, ends up reading 2 to 3 mph higher than they should. This has been verified by different members cars and by VBox data. However, NHRA still runs big events there and they don't seem to have a problem with it, so hey.... we won't mind the extra boost either
it would be nice and coolMBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
it would be nice and cool
Yeah rather than derailing this thread even more... Originally Posted by sighting
Lets start a new thread to see who is up for sacramento run in the next 2 weeks or so before the rains come.
it would be nice and cool

This thread has turned into C63 general discussion. I forget what the OP's post was about...

MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:

Track speeds at Sacramento have been a little controversial around here. You can probably read more about it in the W211 section across a few threads. Basically, since the big accident at Sacramento a couple of years ago, they apparently had to re-set their measuring equipment for the trap speeds and it is said that they've set the beams closer together than they "should" be, which as a result, ends up reading 2 to 3 mph higher than they should. This has been verified by different members cars and by VBox data. However, NHRA still runs big events there and they don't seem to have a problem with it, so hey.... we won't mind the extra boost either
Very interesting information. Why did they have to reset the beams because of the accident? Sorry, I don't know about the accident.Originally Posted by MB_Forever
They both have about the same elevation but Infineon usually experiences more head wind (sometimes cross winds) which tend to slow it down a bit. More important though is the fact that at Infineon, you will not be able to make too many runs: maybe 2 to 3 for the whole night. It is usually always crowded. Don't get me wrong, Infineon is a much bigger, much better, and much more maintained and up-kept track than Sacramento ever will be, but it's just always crowded. At Sacramento, you can run as many times as you want. They're only downfall is track prep tends to be horrible for street tires. And I mean really freakin bad.... 
Track speeds at Sacramento have been a little controversial around here. You can probably read more about it in the W211 section across a few threads. Basically, since the big accident at Sacramento a couple of years ago, they apparently had to re-set their measuring equipment for the trap speeds and it is said that they've set the beams closer together than they "should" be, which as a result, ends up reading 2 to 3 mph higher than they should. This has been verified by different members cars and by VBox data. However, NHRA still runs big events there and they don't seem to have a problem with it, so hey.... we won't mind the extra boost either
Damn if i stall it up to 1600rpm instead of just flooring it from idle mid 11s here i come for sure
thanks dodger
thanks dodger
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
thanks dodger
Not sure if it's that simple but I like loading it up!?! Takes some practice to get it down just make sure you nail the gas a split second before letting the brake goOriginally Posted by RNS-11Z
Damn if i stall it up to 1600rpm instead of just flooring it from idle mid 11s here i come for surethanks dodger
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreYeah sweet, on my 11.90 run i wheel spun, definately need to get more heat into the mickeys if im going to stall it up
thanks for the advice
thanks for the advice
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
thanks for the advice
What was you 60'Originally Posted by RNS-11Z
Yeah sweet, on my 11.90 run i wheel spun, definately need to get more heat into the mickeys if im going to stall it upthanks for the advice
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
I have the P-30 package meaning LSD baby!Originally Posted by dodger63
I do not have an lsd. And thanks for the good luck


MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:

This thread has turned into C63 general discussion. I forget what the OP's post was about...
Sorry, I was part of the derailing process and I sincerely apologize to the OP for what happened. It is always interesting to exchange ideas and points of views with so many people that we sometimes forget the purpose of the thread.Originally Posted by propain
Yeah rather than derailing this thread even more... 
This thread has turned into C63 general discussion. I forget what the OP's post was about...
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:

You seem like that is something so great??Originally Posted by Jons95c36amg
I have the P-30 package meaning LSD baby!
Super Member
I think we all need to keep in mind that as 60 foot times drop along with ETs so does trap speed. Running a 121 trap at 11.8 is not the same as running the same trap at 11.3.
Not a knock on anyone just something else for us all to consider as we prepare for fall MADNESS!
Not a knock on anyone just something else for us all to consider as we prepare for fall MADNESS!

MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Yea I'm consistent 1.73-1.78Originally Posted by RNS-11Z
60 was 1.8*
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Not a knock on anyone just something else for us all to consider as we prepare for fall MADNESS!
Wait what are you trying to say?Originally Posted by RStevens63
I think we all need to keep in mind that as 60 foot times drop along with ETs so does trap speed. Running a 121 trap at 11.8 is not the same as running the same trap at 11.3. Not a knock on anyone just something else for us all to consider as we prepare for fall MADNESS!
Super Member
Quote:
Basically that it's a lot harder to run these ETs and traps than most seem to think. It's not an automatic or given just because someone else was able to do it with different parts. A 11.3 @ 121 is more impressive than an 11.8@121, because when the 11.8 car hooks MPH is going to drop. Whereas if the 11.3 car spins it's going to go up.Originally Posted by dodger63
Essie what are you trying to say?
Quote:
Lol I just wanna let OE tunings numbers speak for themselves.Originally Posted by bhamg
And so it continues...OP, you are far too kind, I would have ripped someone a new one pages ago...pages ago.
Speaking of numbers, I had my car dyno tuned at Gintani this afternoon. I will have the numbers posted soon. I thought the car was fast before but now...HOOLLYYY S********T!!!!!
Super Member
Quote:
From what I've seen in pics the way your car sits that's incredible! Originally Posted by dodger63
Yea I'm consistent 1.73-1.78
KWs are def on my "list".
Super Member
Quote:
Speaking of numbers, I had my car dyno tuned at Gintani this afternoon. I will have the numbers posted soon. I thought the car was fast before but now...HOOLLYYY S********T!!!!!
Wait so the dyno made your car faster? Originally Posted by _AMG_
Lol I just wanna let OE tunings numbers speak for themselves.Speaking of numbers, I had my car dyno tuned at Gintani this afternoon. I will have the numbers posted soon. I thought the car was fast before but now...HOOLLYYY S********T!!!!!
j/k

Looking forward to your results!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
I think I'm following and if I'm understanding correct, u are right!Originally Posted by RStevens63
Basically that it's a lot harder to run these ETs and traps than most seem to think. It's not an automatic or given just because someone else was able to do it with different parts. A 11.3 @ 121 is more impressive than an 11.8@121, because when the 11.8 car hooks MPH is going to drop. Whereas if the 11.3 car spins it's going to go up.
MBWorld Fanatic!
I hope some records go down. Remember guys, regardless
of the tune, we are all trying for the same thing, to advance
the 63 platform.
Also, keep in mind the track can be a heartbreaker. Every
car I've ever owned always felt faster on the street but
the track was a different story.
of the tune, we are all trying for the same thing, to advance
the 63 platform.
Also, keep in mind the track can be a heartbreaker. Every
car I've ever owned always felt faster on the street but
the track was a different story.
MBWorld Fanatic!
I'm trying to think of what your saying pretty much if I understand your saying since I run drags all the time my mph will be lower then someone that's on street tires! This is true or even if u spin the dr's it goes up my highest trap was almost 125 with an 11.7 it spun for the first 50' cause as (dads) pointed out to me.. I forgot to lower the pressure in the tires.. I was excited.. Haha
Quote:
j/k
Looking forward to your results!
Lol Originally Posted by RStevens63
Wait so the dyno made your car faster? j/k

Looking forward to your results!
I had it flashed last week with no dyno tune.
the dyno tune made it faster, yes.

