C63/C63S AMG
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Yabeela Turbo Reviews

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-07-2019, 02:59 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
karriemfolger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 20
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
2019 C63s AMG
Yabeela Turbo Reviews

Does anyone have any personal experiences with Yabeela Auto Parts whether it be there Turbos or any other mods they sell? I haven't been able to find any reviews online. I'm thinking of going with their YB.4 Turbos
Old 01-07-2019, 04:10 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Schulminator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 513
Received 57 Likes on 55 Posts
2015 C63s Sedan
DSawyer is the only one I’m aware of that has their turbo setup...his posts on here and Instagram show 800+ at the tires...but the stock tranny gave out shortly after
Old 01-08-2019, 02:35 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
raudiace4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 1,499
Received 587 Likes on 336 Posts
19 E63s, 23 M3 compX, B9 SQ5
I heard there is a lot of custom fabrication involved in getting them on, or at least more so than what's advertised. It's not just plug and play. But don't quote me.
Old 01-10-2019, 11:23 AM
  #4  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by raudiace4
I heard there is a lot of custom fabrication involved in getting them on, or at least more so than what's advertised. It's not just plug and play. But don't quote me.
Very False!

They bolt on to stock manifolds and downpipes with perfect fitment.

The only modification is you need to put a very small bend in the stock oil return tube on the drivers side housing.

Being ball bearing, they spool and respond just as fast as the stock journal bearing turbos except they keep making power instead of losing steam up top.

My car is making 828 whp and 780 ft. lbs. of torque with these turbos on 93 octane fuel and twin 1000 cc Meth injection nozzles.

Yes, trans is slipping right now, but you could tune this setup to a very reliable 775/700 hp/tq setup on stock trans and it would hold. I'm just past the limit.

Solution coming soon!

The following users liked this post:
DIVINE AMG (01-22-2019)
Old 01-10-2019, 11:28 AM
  #5  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by raudiace4
I heard there is a lot of custom fabrication involved in getting them on, or at least more so than what's advertised. It's not just plug and play. But don't quote me.
Very False!

They bolt on to stock manifolds and downpipes with perfect fitment.

The only modification is you need to put a very small bend in the stock oil return tube on the drivers side housing.

Being ball bearing, they spool and respond just as fast as the stock journal bearing turbos except they keep making power instead of losing steam up top.

My car is making 828 whp and 780 ft. lbs. of torque with these turbos on 93 octane fuel and twin 1000 cc Meth injection nozzles.

Yes, trans is slipping right now, but you could tune this setup to a very reliable 775/700 hp/tq setup on stock trans and it would hold. I'm just past the limit.

Solution coming soon!

Old 01-11-2019, 12:15 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
raudiace4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 1,499
Received 587 Likes on 336 Posts
19 E63s, 23 M3 compX, B9 SQ5
Originally Posted by DSawyer63
Very False!

They bolt on to stock manifolds and downpipes with perfect fitment.

The only modification is you need to put a very small bend in the stock oil return tube on the drivers side housing.

Being ball bearing, they spool and respond just as fast as the stock journal bearing turbos except they keep making power instead of losing steam up top.

My car is making 828 whp and 780 ft. lbs. of torque with these turbos on 93 octane fuel and twin 1000 cc Meth injection nozzles.

Yes, trans is slipping right now, but you could tune this setup to a very reliable 775/700 hp/tq setup on stock trans and it would hold. I'm just past the limit.

Solution coming soon!
That's good info, the people I know having issues with fitment are on the W213 E63. Figured C63s would have same issue but guess not.
Old 01-11-2019, 07:31 PM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Does anyone have an install guide for turbo swaps (EPC WIS)? I'm curious what's involved and how long it takes. Seems like it wouldn't take long to install stock frame/hybrid turbos with them sitting right there in the V.
Old 01-12-2019, 09:18 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
gOt BoOsT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sac, Ca
Posts: 424
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
‘17 GT F1A E85 Monster ‘16 C63s
@dsawyer63 How much boost are you running? It sounds like you were on a high reading dyno cause that’s a lot of power for stock frame turbos. Is that 131mph pass on that setup? If so, it’s def not making near 850whp because that power level would put you in the 145mph and 9.5 second zone. Not trying to bust your ***** brotha, but the power figure caught my attention since I’m a horsepower junkie lol.
Old 01-12-2019, 10:56 AM
  #9  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by gOt BoOsT
@dsawyer63 How much boost are you running? It sounds like you were on a high reading dyno cause that’s a lot of power for stock frame turbos. Is that 131mph pass on that setup? If so, it’s def not making near 850whp because that power level would put you in the 145mph and 9.5 second zone. Not trying to bust your ***** brotha, but the power figure caught my attention since I’m a horsepower junkie lol.
Nothing "stock frame" about these turbos....

My 131 pass was on stock frame turbos and about 690 whp.

I have not ran the new setup with 828whp yet due to my transmission issues.

My car will be ready when the Drag strips open back up here in March/April so I should have some good results for everyone then!


The following users liked this post:
Schulminator (01-13-2019)
Old 01-12-2019, 11:08 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
gOt BoOsT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sac, Ca
Posts: 424
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
‘17 GT F1A E85 Monster ‘16 C63s
Oh so they aren’t stock frames machined with larger turbines like every other company makes. Ok that makes sense that the 131 pass was around 650whp. Keep everyone updated once you hit the track brotha!
Old 01-12-2019, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Mr. Pink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
W205 c63s AMG
Lmfao what in the world makes you guys think these are stock frames?! It's very very apparent they're not.

Also if I am to chime in, price on these are pretty awesome as there isn't a core and you get to keep your stocks. If I were to do it again, I probably would have sacked up and got these over my pure 900s, near same cost if you keep your cores
Old 01-12-2019, 01:24 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AlexZTuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,537
Received 368 Likes on 262 Posts
2017 Porsche 911 C4
Originally Posted by Mr. Pink
Lmfao what in the world makes you guys think these are stock frames?! It's very very apparent they're not.

Also if I am to chime in, price on these are pretty awesome as there isn't a core and you get to keep your stocks. If I were to do it again, I probably would have sacked up and got these over my pure 900s, near same cost if you keep your cores
I probably shouldn’t of hijacked the thread by mentioning stock frame/hybrid turbos! Just curious what’s involved in a standard turbo swap for the M177. Yabeela turbos are huge (definitely custom compressor and turbine castings), so I assume it would be slightly more involving.

Does anyone have a print out for the Mercedes install guide for turbo replacement? I’m itching to install this set I have, I just don’t want to spend the whole weekend doing it.
Old 01-12-2019, 03:10 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
gOt BoOsT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sac, Ca
Posts: 424
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
‘17 GT F1A E85 Monster ‘16 C63s
Originally Posted by Mr. Pink
Lmfao what in the world makes you guys think these are stock frames?! It's very very apparent they're not.

Also if I am to chime in, price on these are pretty awesome as there isn't a core and you get to keep your stocks. If I were to do it again, I probably would have sacked up and got these over my pure 900s, near same cost if you keep your cores
No need to get your panties in a wad over a simple question. Haven’t even seen the turbos and figured they were stock variants since they bolt on without modification to intake or downpipes.
Old 01-13-2019, 08:59 AM
  #14  
Member
 
blaferty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S
Can anyone compare & contrast yabeela to weistec w.4 turbos?
Old 01-16-2019, 02:43 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
MrkiC63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 308
Received 59 Likes on 40 Posts
MB C63 AMG
Originally Posted by blaferty
Can anyone compare & contrast yabeela to weistec w.4 turbos?
I think both are GTX 3071 cores



Last edited by MrkiC63; 01-16-2019 at 02:48 AM.
Old 01-17-2019, 04:33 PM
  #16  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by MrkiC63
I think both are GTX 3071 cores


The Yabeela is a 58/76 core where the W4 is a 53/71. The Yabeela is closer to a GT3076R.
I would also like to mention on a side note that there is almost no lag due to the light weight efficient design of the YP4.
The following 2 users liked this post by DSawyer63:
blaferty (01-17-2019), raudiace4 (05-24-2019)
Old 01-20-2019, 08:33 AM
  #17  
Super Member
 
RDO247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 908
Received 117 Likes on 102 Posts
C63S
Originally Posted by DSawyer63
The Yabeela is a 58/76 core where the W4 is a 53/71. The Yabeela is closer to a GT3076R.
I would also like to mention on a side note that there is almost no lag due to the light weight efficient design of the YP4.
What supporting mods do recommend when fitting these turbos?

Is it as simply as bolting on the new turbos and retuning?

Looking to go Stage 3 soon so looking at turbo options atm.
Old 01-20-2019, 10:06 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
PL27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: new york
Posts: 261
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
x
Dougs car ran a 10.5 @ 135 with the new turbos lol


i don’t get why he claims not running the car and “trans threw in the towel”
Old 01-20-2019, 03:53 PM
  #19  
Member
 
DRGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 153
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
C63S AMG Coupe
Originally Posted by DSawyer63
The Yabeela is a 58/76 core where the W4 is a 53/71. The Yabeela is closer to a GT3076R.
I would also like to mention on a side note that there is almost no lag due to the light weight efficient design of the YP4.
Is there less lag than with the stock turbos?
Old 01-22-2019, 07:19 PM
  #20  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by PL27
Dougs car ran a 10.5 @ 135 with the new turbos lol



i don’t get why he claims not running the car and “trans threw in the towel”
Watch my Dragy video and listen. It's slipping hard, and still faster than you 60-130, wasn't your 60-130 in the 6s? Mine is 5.85. The power combined with a drag launch and the trans couldn't take it. Also I settled for 10.4s almost 2 years ago, so I'm working on a goal with less digits than that. 🍿 🍿 🍿

View this post on Instagram
Old 01-22-2019, 07:30 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
PL27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: new york
Posts: 261
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
x
Originally Posted by DSawyer63
Watch my Dragy video and listen. It's slipping hard, and still faster than you 60-130, wasn't your 60-130 in the 6s? Mine is 5.85. The power combined with a drag launch and the trans couldn't take it. Also I settled for 10.4s almost 2 years ago, so I'm working on a goal with less digits than that. 🍿 🍿 🍿

https://www.instagram.com/p/BqBDOvRD..._web_copy_link
60-130 is all gearing. I did 6.02 at the dragstrip with 0% slope. Of course i go faster on the highway with a downhill. Dont worry my 10.46 will be easy to beat but my 141mph trap wont be easy to beat. Good luck lol. 5.8 60-130 and a 135mph trap sounds kind of weak to me 🤷🏼*♂️
Old 01-22-2019, 07:45 PM
  #22  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by PL27

60-130 is all gearing. I did 6.02 at the dragstrip with 0% slope. Of course i go faster on the highway with a downhill. Dont worry my 10.46 will be easy to beat but my 141mph trap wont be easy to beat. Good luck lol. 5.8 60-130 and a 135mph trap sounds kind of weak to me 🤷🏼*♂️
You're right, gearing helps. Your car has a 2.82 gear which is way better for 60-130 and trap speed than the 3.06 my coupe had in this dragy test. But, now I have a 2.65 gear so It'll be even better. Also you're right 10.5 @ at 135 is weak although it's not weak when you consider the amount of slipping going on. Once those clutches let go the wheels are probably seeing 550 hp max.
Old 01-22-2019, 08:31 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
PL27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: new york
Posts: 261
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
x
Originally Posted by DSawyer63
You're right, gearing helps. Your car has a 2.82 gear which is way better for 60-130 and trap speed than the 3.06 my coupe had in this dragy test. But, now I have a 2.65 gear so It'll be even better. Also you're right 10.5 @ at 135 is weak although it's not weak when you consider the amount of slipping going on. Once those clutches let go the wheels are probably seeing 550 hp max.
your car has alot of potential, with the right tuner. As I recommended Kevin @ GoLabWorx will be your best shot. Best 4.0L tuner ever. And my 3rd is starts at 60mph and i dont hit boost till 75ish mph so kills my time and my 90-100 / 100-110 is a 1.2 second difference compared to others .8
Old 01-22-2019, 10:10 PM
  #24  
Member
 
DSawyer63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Saint Charles, Illinois
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
2012 C63 P30 Sedan
Originally Posted by PL27

your car has alot of potential, with the right tuner. As I recommended Kevin @ GoLabWorx will be your best shot. Best 4.0L tuner ever. And my 3rd is starts at 60mph and i dont hit boost till 75ish mph so kills my time and my 90-100 / 100-110 is a 1.2 second difference compared to others .8
777 is 777 and 828 is 828 just saying... I'm sure your car is working the best it possibly can which is 6s 60-130 and under 800 whp. just text me you've got my number
Old 05-22-2019, 10:02 PM
  #25  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MuffinFlavored's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,256
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts
2018 W213 E 63 S AMG Sedan
"The Yabeela is a 58/76 core where the W4 is a 53/71. The Yabeela is closer to a GT3076R."

Does Yabeela uses a Precision turbo part? https://www.precisionturbo.net/Stree...PT5858-CEA/232 I see this is a 58mm, 76 trim wheel.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Yabeela Turbo Reviews



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:59 PM.