Affordable performance tire?
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Traction Grades
UTQG Traction Grades are based on the tire's straight line wet coefficient of traction as the tire skids across the specified test surfaces. The UTQG traction test does not evaluate dry braking, dry cornering, wet cornering, or high speed hydroplaning resistance.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=48
Yes, I just looked at my previous post and realized I made a typo. I'm running DW's, not DWS's on my car and I was looking for real experience with how the others compare to the DW.
They are a good overall tire, wearing well so far and they do have good wet traction. I put on snow tires in winter so I do not care that they are terrible on ice and snow. My reason for looking at other tires is simply straight line traction. They just do not grip well at all below about 50mph on my car.
FWIW, sidewall traction ratings are a poor measure of real world traction and performance. I ran Hankook Ventus tiers on my Lightning and while they wore like iron, they also gripped like they were made out of iron. If I hit a bump at WOT doing 100mph they would break loose and spin until I let off. Nothing as exciting as drifting an F150 at over 100mph. The Hankooks would last me over 20,000 miles a set on that truck even though I laid MILES of rubber with them monthly but had no grip on my L in first or second gear. The past three years I just ran M&H drag radials on the rear so I could actually get grip. The CL has better weight distribution and less torque than my L did though.
Last edited by Dr Matt; Dec 16, 2014 at 05:17 PM.
They are a good overall tire, wearing well so far and they do have good wet traction. I put on snow tires in winter so I do not care that they are terrible on ice and snow. My reason for looking at other tires is simply straight line traction. They just do not grip well at all below about 50mph on my car.
FWIW, sidewall traction ratings are a poor measure of real world traction and performance. I ran Hankook Ventus tiers on my Lightning and while they wore like iron, they also gripped like they were made out of iron. If I hit a bump at WOT doing 100mph they would break loose and spin until I let off. Nothing as exciting as drifting an F150 at over 100mph. The Hankooks would last me over 20,000 miles a set on that truck even though I laid MILES of rubber with them monthly but had no grip on my L in first or second gear. The past three years I just ran M&H drag radials on the rear so I could actually get grip. The CL has better weight distribution and less torque than my L did though.
Please note that I am using the older generation Hankooks on my car and have no supporting data for the new updated version of the V12s.
My next tire will be a Toyo Proxie T1R or I may try out the michelin pilot sport cup 2.. My options are limited on the size of my rims..
I have ridden in a couple cars with Cup 2s and they seem to have great cornering grip but they only last a couple times around the block and cost big bucks.
Best grip so far I had with Michelin AS/3 tires (Shelby) plus they come with 45k warranty - unfortunately, not available in sizes for the CL600.
On the CL, I have the Hankook V12 evo2 (rated for 190mph and "extra load" (XL), 245s in the front and 275s in the back (both 20"). I put them through the paces as soon as I had them mounted and I am very happy with them - they are not as good as Michelins but they cost only half as much. Since I am not gunning the CL through the corners, Hankooks will be more than enough.
Yokohamas are excellent all-season tires which won't break the budget. Over the years, these tires have never let me down.
Tires to avoid on the CL: "Sunny" and "Sumitomo". Horrible quality and ride.
I am sure there others which can break any budget. Make sure you budget for new ball joints and struts if you get top-dollar tires
Last edited by CL600CK60V12; Dec 17, 2014 at 06:06 PM. Reason: md










