That ain't right.
Methinks something was amiss....
.
Methinks something was amiss....

.
Super Member
Quote:
kbahl21 Never !Originally Posted by c552slick
kbahl21 spanked the **** out of C55 AMG he must be modded.


MBworld Guru
C55: 362 hp @ 5,750 rpm, 376 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm
CLK550: 382 hp @ 6,000 rpm; 391 lb-ft @ 2,800 rpm
The advertised 0-60 on the C55 is 4.9. For the CLK550, it's 5.1.
If this was a simple drag race, then the C55 should barely win, but if it's a road race, I suspect the higher torque at lower RPM's, along with the CLK550's 7-speed gearbox would win.
CLK550: 382 hp @ 6,000 rpm; 391 lb-ft @ 2,800 rpm
The advertised 0-60 on the C55 is 4.9. For the CLK550, it's 5.1.
If this was a simple drag race, then the C55 should barely win, but if it's a road race, I suspect the higher torque at lower RPM's, along with the CLK550's 7-speed gearbox would win.
MBWorld Fanatic!
How bad did you get destroyed lol?
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
ExploreQuote:
3-4 cars.. this is not funny at all! i have a damn AMG!Originally Posted by togaclk55
How bad did you get destroyed lol?
Banned
Quote:
get off that high horse dude, u only have a C55! u got spanked by a better car. If you want a faster car, upgrade to a CLK55 or CLK63.Originally Posted by c552slick
3-4 cars.. this is not funny at all! i have a damn AMG!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudeney
If this was a simple drag race, then the C55 should barely win, but if it's a road race, I suspect the higher torque at lower RPM's, along with the CLK550's 7-speed gearbox would win.
Totally agreed !!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Well, the 550 is faster than a 55 so you can't expect to win stock vs stock, but it should have been closer than 3-4 carsOriginally Posted by c552slick
3-4 cars.. this is not funny at all! i have a damn AMG!
MBWorld Fanatic!
where do you live ??
was the clk black ??
what do you thing guys ?? badblack ??

was the clk black ??
what do you thing guys ?? badblack ??


Interesting! I have both. Recently purchased the CLK550. They feel very close when you drive one and then the other but I was putting my money on my C55 being a bit faster.... Uh oh!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
try doing the "sneaky ecu reset" use paddles and drive violently. The adaptive tranny shifting is a pain in the buttOriginally Posted by F1Bobby
Interesting! I have both. Recently purchased the CLK550. They feel very close when you drive one and then the other but I was putting my money on my C55 being a bit faster.... Uh oh!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Look at all the 550 owners all happy! I'm still proud of my AMG and besides, I'll spank a 550 anyday!!
MBworld Guru
Quote:
Originally Posted by elijah
Look at all the 550 owners all happy! I'm still proud of my AMG and besides, I'll spank a 550 anyday!!
Not likely - the CLK550 outperforms the CLK55. There was a R&T or C&R or M/T comparo that they did when the CLK550 came out. It wasn't a "spanking", but the CLK550 bested the CLK55. On paper, they have identical 0-60 times, but again, the higher torque/hp and faster-shifting 7-speed in the 550 wins (your CLK55 engine is identical in specs to the C55).
Now, don't confuse this with other "55" AMG models like the E55, SL55, CL55 or S55, since those are all supercharged and pumping out 500+/- hp.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kbahl21
try doing the "sneaky ecu reset" use paddles and drive violently. The adaptive tranny shifting is a pain in the butt
Ok! I'm going to be a bit disappointed if my CLK550 IS faster... Just sayn!

MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
it is, i know from experience lolOriginally Posted by F1Bobby
Ok! I'm going to be a bit disappointed if my CLK550 IS faster... Just sayn!
MBWorld Fanatic!
I think it is highly unlikely that a stock CLK550 will "destroy" a stock C55 in any type of drag race, unless there is a significant difference in driver skill (too much wheel spin when launching from a dig, or being in the wrong gear for a rolling start).
Yes, the CLK550 has more HP (382 @ 6000rpm vs 362 @ 5750rpm) and more torque (391 lb-ft @2800-4800rpm vs 376 lb-ft @ 4000rpm). However, the CLK550 has a heavier curb weight than the C55 (3720 lbs vs 3540 lbs).
For a straight line drag race, the CLK550 may have an edge because of more power, but the C55 has the advantage with regards to weight. Some of you claim that the CLK550's non-AMG 7 speed transmission shifts faster than the AMG Speedshift 5 speed transmission that the C55 has. I don't buy it, unless you show me some documentation. As far as I know, the C55's Speedshift AMG transmission in S and M modes shifts 35% faster than non-AMG slushboxes.
And on a road coarse (with turns), I would put my money on the C55 being faster with regards to laptimes as the AMG tuned chassis has higher skidpad grip and slalom speeds, ESP retuned to mimic a mechanical LSD, and a transmission that allows for complete manual control in M mode.
I'm not saying the CLK550 is not faster in a straight line, but I find it hard to believe that it will "destroy" a C55.
I actually can't find any road test of the CLK550 from Road & Track, Car & Driver, or Motortrend. Please post some objective test numbers if you have them.
Yes, the CLK550 has more HP (382 @ 6000rpm vs 362 @ 5750rpm) and more torque (391 lb-ft @2800-4800rpm vs 376 lb-ft @ 4000rpm). However, the CLK550 has a heavier curb weight than the C55 (3720 lbs vs 3540 lbs).
For a straight line drag race, the CLK550 may have an edge because of more power, but the C55 has the advantage with regards to weight. Some of you claim that the CLK550's non-AMG 7 speed transmission shifts faster than the AMG Speedshift 5 speed transmission that the C55 has. I don't buy it, unless you show me some documentation. As far as I know, the C55's Speedshift AMG transmission in S and M modes shifts 35% faster than non-AMG slushboxes.
And on a road coarse (with turns), I would put my money on the C55 being faster with regards to laptimes as the AMG tuned chassis has higher skidpad grip and slalom speeds, ESP retuned to mimic a mechanical LSD, and a transmission that allows for complete manual control in M mode.
I'm not saying the CLK550 is not faster in a straight line, but I find it hard to believe that it will "destroy" a C55.
I actually can't find any road test of the CLK550 from Road & Track, Car & Driver, or Motortrend. Please post some objective test numbers if you have them.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
there isnt one, there are 0 tests done on the clk550. you can use the test done on the 2010 E550 coupe though. however clk550 is lighter than the e550coupeOriginally Posted by PC Valkyrie
I actually can't find any road test of the CLK550 from Road & Track, Car & Driver, or Motortrend. Please post some objective test numbers if you have them.
Quote:
I don't know why you would be disappointed. You own both cars, just enjoy them! Originally Posted by F1Bobby
Ok! I'm going to be a bit disappointed if my CLK550 IS faster... Just sayn!
MBWorld Fanatic!
Quote:
Originally Posted by PC Valkyrie
For a straight line drag race, the CLK550 may have an edge because of more power, but the C55 has the advantage with regards to weight. Some of you claim that the CLK550's non-AMG 7 speed transmission shifts faster than the AMG Speedshift 5 speed transmission that the C55 has. I don't buy it, unless you show me some documentation. As far as I know, the C55's Speedshift AMG transmission in S and M modes shifts 35% faster than non-AMG slushboxes..
Let me guess.....you own a C55.
I think the most benefit from a straight line performance up to top speed might be the 7-speed vs the 5-speed because of the gearing. I would think with the 7-speed, you always in a better power band then the 5-speed on every gears shifting. It kindna like changing out the gear ratio on the diff. can give you that .5 sec. quicker








