Single arm windshield wiper
Wonder why MB ever did away with it and returned to the conventional two arms setup on the W211?
[cross posted on W211 AMG forum]
Wonder why MB ever did away with it and returned to the conventional two arms setup on the W211?
[cross posted on W211 AMG forum]
. I personally dislike the single wiper concept though it does look elegant.




Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Hard to go back to two arms.
When the wiper breaks there is no cleaning. With a two wiper system you still have 50% function.
The one arm bandit is such a bad design.
When the wiper breaks there is no cleaning. With a two wiper system you still have 50% function.
The one arm bandit is such a bad design.
The aspect I am very impressed with though is how large an area of the windshield that one wiper arm was able to cover and clear.
But if reliability is an issue, then I guess it wasn't such a great feat of engineering after all...
Last edited by Barry45RPM; Feb 2, 2008 at 12:12 PM.
I have heard they can rip out of the car if the blade is frozen to the windshield, since the motor is so strong.
I think old style two blade systems cover 76%
The single arm system covers 95%
The new style two arm systems cover 97% I think.




Interesting how other manufacturers had the mono wiper and then abandoned it. Remember the VW Scirocco? And Jaguar XJ-6 starting in 1988?
I always felt that the mono wiper had to travel twice as fast as two wipers to cover the same area, so during a heavy rain it has to really race across the windshield.
Anyone remember Jaguar E-types from the late 60's, perhaps early 70's with THREE wiper blades?
I think this concept could have been perfected, but that would have taken a lot of money to make it quieter, faster and more reliable. The old Mercedes-Benz would have done that, being they were engineering driven. The new Mercedes is engineering + customer driven. Hence the pivot arm on some models on the driver side and a regular arm on the passenger side. I still think this was one of Mercedes' more brilliant ideas.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Feb 6, 2008 at 04:13 AM.
I think this concept could have been perfected, but that would have taken a lot of money to make it quieter, faster and more reliable. The old Mercedes-Benz would have done that, being they were engineering driven. The new Mercedes is engineering + customer driven. Hence the pivot arm on some models on the driver side and a regular arm on the passenger side. I still think this was one of Mercedes' more brilliant ideas.
M
Of course we've seen the downside of this goal with the lowered quality and customer satisfaction scores the past few years, all of which MB is now correcting and has already seen some returns on this investment.
I, for one, am sorry to see MB's change from being an engineering company to a consumer products company because the W124 was, and still is, a very solid car - not sure if our W210/211 will hold up as well 20 years after it leaves the assembly line.
the only problem with them is that the ricer crowd thinks you're one of them...

they can't be all bad though, they're making a comeback!

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/au..._go_go_go.html
Last edited by ZedStyle; Feb 7, 2008 at 02:20 AM.
Of course we've seen the downside of this goal with the lowered quality and customer satisfaction scores the past few years, all of which MB is now correcting and has already seen some returns on this investment.
I, for one, am sorry to see MB's change from being an engineering company to a consumer products company because the W124 was, and still is, a very solid car - not sure if our W210/211 will hold up as well 20 years after it leaves the assembly line.
M




