Expensive service B
I will call their service manager tomorrow. Ask their explanation why the unrequired service were added without explaining to the customer....
here is my experience, i told them to f off, it's 20k mile car, shouldn't need anything.
https://mbworld.org/forums/glk-class...e-rip-off.html

This not the first time that people on this forum have complained about the dollars spent versus the value for these services. I have not done these services through the dealer for that exact reason. My garage follows the inspections and services shown in the manual for a fraction of the cost and I think mine runs and performs just fine.
Sorry that you spent the $$$$'s that you did but I'm not sure that anyone can justify that kind of expense for a low mileage vehicle.

It's like the dentist stating you need root canal when you darn well know you only need a filling or a cavity.

If you're not a mechanic like MBRedux, then more folks are going to get ripped off unless we voice our beef.... my 2 cents

I will call their service manager tomorrow. Ask their explanation why the unrequired service were added without explaining to the customer....
OMG!
I almost spit out my mid morning coffee!
Last edited by yualfred; May 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM.
Trending Topics
I will call their service manager tomorrow. Ask their explanation why the unrequired service were added without explaining to the customer....
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I drive so little 16,000 Km's a year that I think it's crazy to have to do all these inspections on such a new car. Only owned Acura's in the past (i know you guys do'nt consider them on the same level as MB) but that $50 service A and $150 Service B where they actually do work sure sounds more reasonable than a bunch of visual inspections.
No, this is not correct. I, you, even Bozo the Clown can maintain your car without affecting your factory warranty (on any car) as long as the *Service Schedule* is followed and the person doing the work is competent enough. The Schedule Booklet is in with the Owners Manual zipper pack.
It is against the law to void warranties if the required service is performed by the owner or any other service facility other than the dealership.
_________________________________________________
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states, in part, in Title 15, United States Code, Section 2302, subdivision (c): No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer's using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the [Federal Trade] Commission if —
(2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest. The Commission shall identify in the Federal Register, and permit public comment on, all applications for waiver of the prohibition of this subsection, and shall publish in the Federal Register its disposition of any such application, including the reasons therefore.
Event participation
Some recent controversy surrounds car manufacturers' monitoring of SCCA (Sports Car Club of America) and NHRA (National Hot Rod Association) events and noting license plates and VINs as a justification for denying warranty coverage and either voiding out the warranty, or placing it on "restricted" status.
The legality of these tactics by automobile manufacturers, in particular where the car is marketed with SCCA membership or literature or advertised in race-modified form, is questionable. To protect yourself, be aware of this trend and take the appropriate precautions in listing critical identifying information when participating in regional autocrosses, tracks days, and drag races.
Last edited by MBRedux; May 11, 2011 at 12:54 PM.


I had other vehicles which required a change every two years.
The reason: brake fluid is hydrostatic, which means it attracts water. The water in the brake fluid can cause rust pitting inside the fluid cylinder resulting in fluid leaking past the rubber plunger. Once this happens the only cure is a rebuild or master replacement.
From " wikipedia" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brake_fluid
Service and maintenance:
Most automotive professionals agree that glycol-based brake fluid, (DOT 3, DOT 4, DOT 5.1) should be flushed, or changed, every 1–2 years.[2] Many manufacturers also require periodic fluid changes to ensure reliability and safety. Once installed, moisture diffuses into the fluid through brake hoses and rubber seals and, eventually, the fluid will have to be replaced when the water content becomes too high. Electronic testers and test strips are commercially available to measure moisture content. The corrosion inhibitors also degrade over time. New fluid should always be stored in a sealed container to avoid moisture intrusion.

lease, always insist the dealer throw in the 3 year 30,000 mile service
included. I have never had a problem getting this.

If you read it there are more inspections than anything else. And what make you think that a C Class or GLK that you but for less than $50K is expensive in todays world. It is in comparison to a KIA Sorento.I think you are missing the point
There should be value for services received, don't you think?
If you read it there are more inspections than anything else. And what make you think that a C Class or GLK that you but for less than $50K is expensive in todays world. It is in comparison to a KIA Sorento.I think you are missing the point
There should be value for services received, don't you think?
I did read the manual and paid the $800 for the 3 years of service. HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA....


