'99 c230K vs '95 Mustang GT 5.0
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
'99 c230K vs '95 Mustang GT 5.0
to start off my first kill story, I honestly thought I was gonna lose. I mean a 4cyl, vs. V-8.
Well this is me n my bestfriend racing, so this is no bull**** story about the GT ****ing up, because he didnt. we raced clean, straight, 4 times, and all 4 times, i took him from the start to end.
I probably pulled about 1 car length in each gear.
finished it off hitting 70mph about 4 car lengths.
Well this is me n my bestfriend racing, so this is no bull**** story about the GT ****ing up, because he didnt. we raced clean, straight, 4 times, and all 4 times, i took him from the start to end.
I probably pulled about 1 car length in each gear.
finished it off hitting 70mph about 4 car lengths.
#2
Super Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95 GT that thing probebly has 200 hp and how many miles on the GT? probebly over 100K so even less than 200HP no wander you took it. dont get to happy race a new GT.
#5
Super Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 4.6L is 215 I dont remember when it was changeg from 5.0 to 4.6 but as far as i can remember the 5.0 is crap and it dosent make 215 hp. and you have to remember its a ford after 50 k miles its junk. MY friend had one craped out at 50 k. I drove the new ones they are fast 260 hp
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 2,570
Received 164 Likes
on
132 Posts
R129 SL55 AMG & W208 CLK55 AMG
Originally posted by Xpeed
95 GT that thing probebly has 200 hp and how many miles on the GT? probebly over 100K so even less than 200HP no wander you took it. dont get to happy race a new GT.
95 GT that thing probebly has 200 hp and how many miles on the GT? probebly over 100K so even less than 200HP no wander you took it. dont get to happy race a new GT.
So gentlemen.. please someone explain to me if this is possible or was his car ****?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG
FYI -
**manual transmissions and coupes - autos and convertables are slower
94-95 Mustang GT 5.0L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
96-97 Mustang GT 4.6L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
98 Mustang GT 4.6 225hp 285ft/lb ~6.5s 0-60
99+ Mustang GT 4.6 260hp 302ft/lb ~5.9s 0-60
94-95 Mustang Cobra 5.0L 240hp 285ft/lb ~6.3s 0-60
96-98 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 305hp 300ft/lb ~5.7s 0-60
99-01 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 320hp 316ft/lb ~5.5s 0-60
03-04 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) SC 390hp 390ft/lb ~4.7s 0-60
** 03-04 Cobras are under-rated tho, dyno results prove the 03-04 cobras make ~405-425 hp stock -- 0-60 times obviously still high 4 second range.
http://dynoperformance.com/article_details.php?ID=20
**manual transmissions and coupes - autos and convertables are slower
94-95 Mustang GT 5.0L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
96-97 Mustang GT 4.6L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
98 Mustang GT 4.6 225hp 285ft/lb ~6.5s 0-60
99+ Mustang GT 4.6 260hp 302ft/lb ~5.9s 0-60
94-95 Mustang Cobra 5.0L 240hp 285ft/lb ~6.3s 0-60
96-98 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 305hp 300ft/lb ~5.7s 0-60
99-01 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 320hp 316ft/lb ~5.5s 0-60
03-04 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) SC 390hp 390ft/lb ~4.7s 0-60
** 03-04 Cobras are under-rated tho, dyno results prove the 03-04 cobras make ~405-425 hp stock -- 0-60 times obviously still high 4 second range.
http://dynoperformance.com/article_details.php?ID=20
Last edited by hantzis; 07-27-2004 at 02:06 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Marlboro , NJ
Posts: 966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1995 w140 s500
Don't you dear say that the mustang runs 5.9 the new one. I have video of me beating a stock mustang of a line and off the roll. 2004 gt mustang with 11,000 miles vs my s500 with 112,000 at that time. now at 115,000
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2004 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by hantzis
FYI -
**manual transmissions and coupes - autos and convertables are slower
94-95 Mustang GT 5.0L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
96-97 Mustang GT 4.6L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
98 Mustang GT 4.6 225hp 285ft/lb ~6.5s 0-60
99+ Mustang GT 4.6 260hp 302ft/lb ~5.9s 0-60
94-95 Mustang Cobra 5.0L 240hp 285ft/lb ~6.3s 0-60
96-98 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 305hp 300ft/lb ~5.7s 0-60
99-01 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 320hp 316ft/lb ~5.5s 0-60
03-04 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) SC 390hp 390ft/lb ~4.7s 0-60
** 03-04 Cobras are under-rated tho, dyno results prove the 03-04 cobras make ~405-425 hp stock -- 0-60 times obviously still high 4 second range.
http://dynoperformance.com/article_details.php?ID=20
**manual transmissions and coupes - autos and convertables are slower
94-95 Mustang GT 5.0L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
96-97 Mustang GT 4.6L 215hp 285ft/lb ~6.7s 0-60
98 Mustang GT 4.6 225hp 285ft/lb ~6.5s 0-60
99+ Mustang GT 4.6 260hp 302ft/lb ~5.9s 0-60
94-95 Mustang Cobra 5.0L 240hp 285ft/lb ~6.3s 0-60
96-98 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 305hp 300ft/lb ~5.7s 0-60
99-01 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) 320hp 316ft/lb ~5.5s 0-60
03-04 Mustang Cobra 4.6L (DOHC) SC 390hp 390ft/lb ~4.7s 0-60
** 03-04 Cobras are under-rated tho, dyno results prove the 03-04 cobras make ~405-425 hp stock -- 0-60 times obviously still high 4 second range.
http://dynoperformance.com/article_details.php?ID=20
Last edited by hantzis; 07-28-2004 at 01:51 PM.
#10
Originally Posted by s0vietbenz
Don't you dear say that the mustang runs 5.9 the new one. I have video of me beating a stock mustang of a line and off the roll. 2004 gt mustang with 11,000 miles vs my s500 with 112,000 at that time. now at 115,000