Kill Stories Discuss your exciting high speed excursions here!

Here's an American car that'll put your Benzes to shame!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-28-2004, 04:58 PM
  #176  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
Why do they call it whoring?
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 07-28-2004, 05:10 PM
  #177  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Posting for no good reason = post whoring.

You are a ***** of posters.

Kind of like how Andrea is an Attention *****...just kidding Red...Ha.
Stiggs is offline  
Old 08-05-2004, 03:55 PM
  #178  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
Originally Posted by Brunelleschi
how the hell does this thread keep coming back?!?!
Brunelleschi; nice C; what wheels are those?
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 08-09-2004, 12:30 AM
  #179  
Member
 
MadDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Grants Pass Oregon
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Mercedes Benz ML320
"ooh, my cadilac will do .002% better on the 1/4 mile, i own you"

ok, would you rather have the luxary and performance and safety that mercedes benz has always and always will have with their products or have an american made veichle (who have stayed up there in quality for years over any american made car).

i'll stick with mercedes, it will turn more heads and get respected more in the community than the cadilac.
MadDawg is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 12:34 PM
  #180  
Jkw
Senior Member
 
Jkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004.5 C 230
Someone please kill this thread!
Jkw is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 01:32 PM
  #181  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
Originally Posted by Jkw
Someone please kill this thread!


This thread is older than you've been a member...it'll die when it's good and ready!
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 05:31 PM
  #182  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by CHATMANR


This thread is older than you've been a member...it'll die when it's good and ready!

OWN3D

This thread will live in our hearts forever!
Stiggs is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 08:24 PM
  #183  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sauceboy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Blimp
Sauceboy01 is offline  
Old 08-10-2004, 09:01 PM
  #184  
Super Member
 
pookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: michigan/ohio/indiana
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 c300 4matic, 2002 c240
cadys are so ugly. true i'm standing on the side of a road with my benz quite often, but at least it's a hot and sexy car.
pookie is offline  
Old 08-11-2004, 04:54 PM
  #185  
Member
 
BoughtaBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KL316
bob, id still rather have my C32 than the CTS-V

and a M3 will still pick up more girls than the CTS-V
It depends on who's driving each car! If you were in the M3, and Brad Pitt (before marriage) was in the CTS-V, I'd bet that you're WRONG! The CTS-V is a nice car, but would I take it over an E55......Not in this lifetime!!
BoughtaBenz is offline  
Old 09-19-2004, 01:44 PM
  #186  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
Originally Posted by Stiggs
OWN3D

This thread will live in our hearts forever!
Lol
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 09-29-2004, 11:25 AM
  #187  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Long live this thread.....anyone see one of these caddies in person? I want to hear some kill stories!!!
Stiggs is offline  
Old 09-29-2004, 11:28 AM
  #188  
Out Of Control!!
 
Brunelleschi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 13,969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the market
Originally Posted by Stiggs
Long live this thread.....anyone see one of these caddies in person? I want to hear some kill stories!!!
Brunelleschi is offline  
Old 09-29-2004, 03:00 PM
  #189  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by Brunelleschi
I like this one better

Stiggs is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:15 PM
  #190  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SAguirre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
04 E320 4 Matic, 95 Audi S6, 99 Carrera 4 Cabrio, 12 Fiat 500 Sport, 00 BMW R1200C 10, BMW R1200R
I am embarased to say that I have owned Cadillacs. All they do is perform in fast in straight acceleration. I don't think that you can say that they put ANY MB to shame since it is very easy to design a car to just be quick in the 1/4 mile or 0 to 60.

I lived in Germany for 3 years and drove a plain 190E 2.3 5 speed and I drove it very very hard. Every time I raced (yes actually raced) with a 5.0 mustang or another American sports car I left them in the dust due to endurannce. There was a 4.6 Stang that actually blew something in the cooling system when trying to pass me! They could get ahead of me, but they could not maintain 125 MPH for longer periods of time. Not to mention, they had rear drum brakes and undersized front disks that were garbage when you had to stand on your brakes when some idiot pull out in front of you at 65 mhp and you are driving 120.

MBs are a well rounded perfomance/confort car. Cadillacs heve gotten better but they are not the same as any German car. It is a totally different design concept. If they make a Cadillac that actually can corner, then it rides like crap for everyday driving. They can get both.

A tuned 1972 Chevy Chevelle will outperform you Cadi, does that say anything?

Just my opinnion and personal experience.

Steve Aguirre
SAguirre is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:41 PM
  #191  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SoCalCLK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,974
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
2017 W205 C43 AMG
Originally Posted by SAguirre
I am embarased to say that I have owned Cadillacs. All they do is perform in fast in straight acceleration. I don't think that you can say that they put ANY MB to shame since it is very easy to design a car to just be quick in the 1/4 mile or 0 to 60.

I lived in Germany for 3 years and drove a plain 190E 2.3 5 speed and I drove it very very hard. Every time I raced (yes actually raced) with a 5.0 mustang or another American sports car I left them in the dust due to endurannce. There was a 4.6 Stang that actually blew something in the cooling system when trying to pass me! They could get ahead of me, but they could not maintain 125 MPH for longer periods of time. Not to mention, they had rear drum brakes and undersized front disks that were garbage when you had to stand on your brakes when some idiot pull out in front of you at 65 mhp and you are driving 120.

MBs are a well rounded perfomance/confort car. Cadillacs heve gotten better but they are not the same as any German car. It is a totally different design concept. If they make a Cadillac that actually can corner, then it rides like crap for everyday driving. They can get both.

A tuned 1972 Chevy Chevelle will outperform you Cadi, does that say anything?

Just my opinnion and personal experience.

Steve Aguirre
Well said, Steve. That should be the final word on this damn thread!!
SoCalCLK is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 04:54 PM
  #192  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
I agree!
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 06:05 PM
  #193  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Stiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 7,892
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2003 CLK55
Originally Posted by SoCalCLK
Well said, Steve. That should be the final word on this damn thread!!
If it were only that easy young jedi...unfortunately this thread will linger on in hell.
Stiggs is offline  
Old 11-04-2004, 09:00 PM
  #194  
Member
 
overboostTSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
90 300e and B5 S4
I didn't read the whole thread but here is my opinion anyway.

Cadillac = Junk I worked at a Cadillac dealer as a porter when I was in High School (many years ago) and I remember brand new Cadillacs with horrible problems. Remember the old aluminum engine eldorado engine 4.6? There build quality and parts are crap. I ordered parts a few times for Cadillacs (not mine) and these cars just made me laugh. I don't care if the Cadillac made 550 whp and was $19,500 brand new its still a junk Cadillac (depreciation) and wouldn't buy one. Its just like the Neon SRT-4 yeah its fast for the money but at the end of the day even if it runs 10's in the 1/4 mile it's still just a Neon. Sorry for the reality check.

Side note: Im not convinced that newer German cars are built that great either.
overboostTSI is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 03:24 AM
  #195  
Member
 
yellowslk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 s2000
I say you guys are being harsh. The CTSV is a good car for the price. And with upgrade it can be a very good proformer. This car does very well in SCCA races and it did well in American Lamans series. I have have to say it is not at the level as a benz. But with the left over money you can have somthing equal or something even better then a benz. You guys should stop looking a symbols and just look at the car as it is.
yellowslk is offline  
Old 11-05-2004, 03:24 AM
  #196  
Member
 
yellowslk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: los angeles
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 s2000
CTSV is ok

I say you guys are being harsh. The CTSV is a good car for the price. And with upgrade it can be a very good proformer. This car does very well in SCCA races and it did well in American Lamans series. I have have to say it is not at the level as a benz. But with the left over money you can have somthing equal or something even better then a benz. You guys should stop looking a symbols and just look at the car as it is.
yellowslk is offline  
Old 11-06-2004, 11:00 PM
  #197  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Fast55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ventura County USA
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'06 E55, '05 SLK55, a few others
The Caddy is a POS. Mutiple problems, including, trans, electrical, etc. It isn't cheap either. I will say it's a step beyond where they were even 5 yrs. ago, but GM has a lot to learn still. It test drives fairly well, but ask an owner what they think after 6 months or so. My neighbor would trade his new Caddy for my almost 3 yr. old E55 in a heartbeat. 'nuff said. :p
Fast55 is offline  
Old 11-07-2004, 12:24 PM
  #198  
Super Member
 
LowCaliTi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: nJ/pHiLLy/nY
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Audi 225 TT.w203 sedan.Bmw 318tiCali.Ed.VW Jetta vr6
this is a base model cts with 18" wheels, and a vette motor. Sounds real reliable.......here's a caddy story.....my mom bought a brand new caddy...everytime it rained there was a 1/2" of water on the passanger floor....it was taken back everytime. they said they replaced the weather stripping about 8 times. finaly she got a hold of a big shot at cadilac and they sent the car to the main factory and took it apart to try and find the problem...........The whole car was built 1/4" off center. so no matter what there was a 1/4 gap somewhere....nice huh? The only good thing was they gave her a new one the next year up. A year later she traded it in for a new special eddition corvette...BIG mistake......P.O.S......conclusion....CTS-V = looks good but deffinitly not even coming close to puting a c-class to shame.
LowCaliTi is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 09:25 AM
  #199  
Super Member
 
CHATMANR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: From Oxnard; living in Ocean View Hills, San Diego, CA
Posts: 526
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'01 C320 SS
Originally Posted by Fast55
The Caddy is a POS. Mutiple problems, including, trans, electrical, etc. It isn't cheap either. I will say it's a step beyond where they were even 5 yrs. ago, but GM has a lot to learn still. It test drives fairly well, but ask an owner what they think after 6 months or so. My neighbor would trade his new Caddy for my almost 3 yr. old E55 in a heartbeat. 'nuff said. :p
Yup; I've heard the same from my neighbor. Rattles everywhere after 6 months. My 2001 is still solid, except for the rear shelf where the deck rattles when I play the radio too loud. But, that rattle has been there since we bought it in Dec. 2000.
CHATMANR is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 09:31 AM
  #200  
Out Of Control!!
 
pocholin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 20,081
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Volvo V90 CC
Originally Posted by The Doctor
Go back to Mexico with Pocholin.
Why me??? I don't even like the CTS! ! !

besides Mexico doesn't want me back, I broke too many hearts when I lived there
pocholin is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 3.00 average.

Quick Reply: Here's an American car that'll put your Benzes to shame!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.