M113k Belt Wrap Kit - with or without bracket?



We all know this solution. Pictures are from @VictoryRoadPerformance website


I can imagine that without a bracket is much easier to do service where you need to remove either the supercharger or serpentine belt.
Some information about the "bracketless" BWK, its translated from German
- My kit doesn't stand out
- Not one of the screws is loaded in shear, bending stress is kept within limits
- The screw on the double deflection pulley - which is already subject to a borderline load - is not additionally loaded
- If the holder is installed correctly, it is impossible for the additional deflection roller to run skewed (!!)
- Nothing needs to be dismantled to change the belt.
============
In the last picture is the "Shardul Metha", "VRP", "DTK" kit.
In my opinion, the kit has 3 major disadvantages:
1. The screw of the double deflection pulley, which is already heavily loaded, is even more heavily loaded.
2. The many tolerances can cause the idler pulley to misalign, which will manifest itself as damaged or shredded belts.
3. The kit must be almost completely disassembled to replace/remove one or both belts.
I would love to hear your ideas about this!












Last edited by SICAMG; Feb 17, 2023 at 12:10 PM.



Would be cool if @VictoryRoadPerformance (or another creator) is able to comment on the brace and the function behind it
Trending Topics



The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Im the vedor of the second "German" BWK.
A friend and I considered the "American style" BWKs and we (automotive engineers) found some vulnerabilities.
- The serviceability wasn't really required at that style. You need to pull of the front bracket to service the belts.
- Tolerances in production were not sufficiently considered, so the belt can (not neccessarily) run at an angle and can be shredded (see several posts in different forums and facebook groups).
- the additional force on the doubler idler pulley screw did not please us.
- shipping to Germany with customs and VAT were very expensive,
so we devided to design our own BWK considering all the vulnerabilities of the existing design.







the first link is a copy of my design without considering the tolerances.
QUOTE=nd-photo.nl;8722856]Thx for the input!
Would be cool if @VictoryRoadPerformance (or another creator) is able to comment on the brace and the function behind it[/QUOTE]
QUOTE=nd-photo.nl;8722856]Thx for the input!
Would be cool if @VictoryRoadPerformance (or another creator) is able to comment on the brace and the function behind it
Can you share your research?



More pics in my thread > https://mbworld.org/forums/c219/8443...ml#post8653485




