1999 w/s202 C55 AMG
C-class AMG production numbers as listed in Post #35 by PC Valkyrie in this thread: https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...t-c55-c32.html
C 36 AMG (W 202) 1993 - 1997 5400
C 43 AMG (W/S 202) 1997 - 2001 3850
C 55 AMG (W/S 202) 1999 - 2001 59
C 32 AMG (W/S 203) 2001 - 2004 8250
C 55 AMG (W/S 203) 2004 - 2007 4600
Read this thread from the w202 forums that contains a hodgepodge of information on the w202 C55: https://mbworld.org/forums/c36-amg-c...5-amg-c43.html
And lastly, PICTURES: http://c280.pmneo.de/index.php?content=gallery&gid=614
The interior is actually very slick IMO for a 1999 vehicle. Mercedes was ahead of its time, as usual.
Just thought this might be interesting to fellow C55 owners.
C-class AMG production numbers as listed in Post #35 by PC Valkyrie in this thread: https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...t-c55-c32.html
Only 59 w/s202 C55 AMGs ever produced? Let's dig further.
Read this thread from the w202 forums that contains a hodgepodge of information on the w202 C55: https://mbworld.org/forums/c36-amg-c...5-amg-c43.html
And lastly, PICTURES: http://c280.pmneo.de/index.php?content=gallery&gid=614
The interior is actually very slick IMO for a 1999 vehicle. Mercedes was ahead of its time, as usual.
Just thought this might be interesting to fellow C55 owners.
That would be the biggest difference between the two and nothing much else.
Last edited by xxaarraa; Feb 3, 2011 at 12:00 PM.
Comparing the 202 to the 203 is like comparing apples to oranges. The 202 is supposed to come in second place to the 203 in all categories because it is a previous generation model. At the time the 202 C36 and C43 was released, it was competitive with other models of the time in terms of weight, power, and looks. It's all relative.
Comparing the 202 to the 203 is like comparing apples to oranges. The 202 is supposed to come in second place to the 203 in all categories because it is a previous generation model. At the time the 202 C36 and C43 was released, it was competitive with other models of the time in terms of weight, power, and looks. It's all relative.
He obviously nds to do some serious research on the W202 built from 1994 till 2000 a good healthy run for 6yrs. Body of the first Mercedes AMG mass produced AMG's in the world.
This car did not have the problems of the E190 if that is also what the above meant. Gd to know that some car enthusiasts especially MB enthusiasts know the history of some of the distinct cars built by MB.
C-class AMG production numbers as listed in Post #35 by PC Valkyrie in this thread: https://mbworld.org/forums/c32-amg-c...t-c55-c32.html
Only 59 w/s202 C55 AMGs ever produced? Let's dig further.
Read this thread from the w202 forums that contains a hodgepodge of information on the w202 C55: https://mbworld.org/forums/c36-amg-c...5-amg-c43.html
And lastly, PICTURES: http://c280.pmneo.de/index.php?content=gallery&gid=614
The interior is actually very slick IMO for a 1999 vehicle. Mercedes was ahead of its time, as usual.
Just thought this might be interesting to fellow C55 owners.
There isn't a whole lot of information out there on the AMG produced C55, however, see this excerpt from the below linked thread:
In the US there have been a few C55 conversions (one was on Ebay a while back) and there is also a C55 with a Kompressor on it that runs a 1/4 mile in the high 11s.
Ok I pulled out the mag, it says there were only 30 W202 C55 built at Affalterbach.
0-62 times from the same mag. (always on the high side):
W202
C36 = 6.9
C43 = 6.5
C55 = 5.5
W203
C32 = 5.2
I don't buy these times at all:
The W202 C55 weighs: 1,570kg has 347 bhp and 376 lb/ft
The W203 C32 weighs 1,635kg has 354bhp and 332 lb/ft.
And they say the C32 is faster, not a chance. The W202 C55 should beat a the new one also.
Trending Topics




The Best of Mercedes & AMG
There isn't a whole lot of information out there on the AMG produced C55, however, see this excerpt from the below linked thread:
https://mbworld.org/forums/general-m...s-new-c55.html
Just so you know, there's been many a test-mule etc with the AMG name on it, BUT I do NOT believe that the W202 C55 was ever sold here as a production vehicle. Every one I have seen or heard of was an engine conversion.............
Last edited by Newzchspy; Feb 3, 2011 at 06:53 PM.
Just so you know, there's been many a test-mule etc with the AMG name on it, BUT I do NOT believe that the W202 C55 was ever sold here as a production vehicle. Everyone I have seen or heard of was a conversion.............

I'd race you, just give me a two second head start and it might be even. LOL
Last edited by LawRens; Feb 3, 2011 at 07:08 PM.
But I do like your car,just when I was looking for one back in 2k4 they were out of my price range at that time. But I would give your car a shot in the mile definitely!
Comparing the 202 to the 203 is like comparing apples to oranges. The 202 is supposed to come in second place to the 203 in all categories because it is a previous generation model. At the time the 202 C36 and C43 was released, it was competitive with other models of the time in terms of weight, power, and looks. It's all relative.

I keeed, I keeeed!!!
Last edited by Mark.D; Feb 3, 2011 at 09:15 PM.




