supercharge m104
#1
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
supercharge m104
Thought maybe some of the c36 guys might be interested.
https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ml#post3202195
https://mbworld.org/forums/e-class-w...ml#post3202195
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
nice, do you have the system fully operational? any specs on how quick you got that 300ce running? i wonder how it would compare to rbycc's 300ce TT...
#4
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
I ran all of these components minus the new intake in a different configuration. If you look at the beginning of the post there are some pictures.
The system runs 9lbs of boost and an Electromotive stand alone injection.
My last dyno before this current build is posted at 311 rwhp and 357 rwtq.
I hope to achieve 400 rwhp on the stock engine. I am going to build new headers and exhaust after this project is over.
The system runs 9lbs of boost and an Electromotive stand alone injection.
My last dyno before this current build is posted at 311 rwhp and 357 rwtq.
I hope to achieve 400 rwhp on the stock engine. I am going to build new headers and exhaust after this project is over.
#5
I ran all of these components minus the new intake in a different configuration. If you look at the beginning of the post there are some pictures.
The system runs 9lbs of boost and an Electromotive stand alone injection.
My last dyno before this current build is posted at 311 rwhp and 357 rwtq.
I hope to achieve 400 rwhp on the stock engine. I am going to build new headers and exhaust after this project is over.
The system runs 9lbs of boost and an Electromotive stand alone injection.
My last dyno before this current build is posted at 311 rwhp and 357 rwtq.
I hope to achieve 400 rwhp on the stock engine. I am going to build new headers and exhaust after this project is over.
Good lucky on the project.
Trending Topics
#9
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
I am planning on selling this. This has been the major catalyst to the newer
design. I am still trying to figure what the cost will be. I will not be supplying a
tune. This will have to be handled on the other end. I can help with this, but unless I do the install and have the car I do not want to be liable for tuning.
I run a standalone injection system, but either larger injectors and or a rising rate fuel pressure regulator, or a piggy back system will work. All have been done with success. There is also the outside chance of getting one of the tuners to do some dyno tuning.
My cost for this project is around $4500.00 for just the components and no fuel management.
I am planning for big horsepower though.
design. I am still trying to figure what the cost will be. I will not be supplying a
tune. This will have to be handled on the other end. I can help with this, but unless I do the install and have the car I do not want to be liable for tuning.
I run a standalone injection system, but either larger injectors and or a rising rate fuel pressure regulator, or a piggy back system will work. All have been done with success. There is also the outside chance of getting one of the tuners to do some dyno tuning.
My cost for this project is around $4500.00 for just the components and no fuel management.
I am planning for big horsepower though.
#10
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
on a 3 liter m104 400whp is great. i wonder how big whp a c36 with the 3.6 liter m104 could get... i recall reading that the TT c36 could make up to 500hp but im not sure if that was wheel hp.
#11
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
Mine is a 3.2 liter. I know of a guy with a 3.6 making 420+ rwhp. To get much above that requires custom pistons. I think that the block and crank are good for 600 crank hp. Actually going with the small bores of the 3.0l start to be advantageous because of cylinder wall thickness.
#13
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
Probably a coulple of weeks. I am then going to go back to the dyno and get a new baseline. After that I am going to build some headers and a complete exhaust system. I think part of my high rpm horsepower problem is exhaust back pressure.
#15
Super Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'98 C43 AMG. Obsidian Blk w/2 tone slvr/blk interior
sorry for the noob question, but how is the supercharger implemented? i see it squeezed inbetween the motor and what seems to be an intercooler, can u go over the design?
thanks
thanks
#16
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
The supercharger is mounted directly to the block under the intake manifold.
Then the intercooler mounts to the blower output. It will then blow out of the intercooler through the two pipes to the plenum. That part is still in debate.
I may change this a little if I do it again. I am using my old intercooler and would select a larger one, in a different shape for future projects. The basic blower location will be unchanged though.
I am running the pulley where the stock water pump would be and then running a electric remote mount pump from mezeire. This should be good for some extra horsepower and better cooling.
Then the intercooler mounts to the blower output. It will then blow out of the intercooler through the two pipes to the plenum. That part is still in debate.
I may change this a little if I do it again. I am using my old intercooler and would select a larger one, in a different shape for future projects. The basic blower location will be unchanged though.
I am running the pulley where the stock water pump would be and then running a electric remote mount pump from mezeire. This should be good for some extra horsepower and better cooling.
#17
MBWorld Fanatic!
Mine is a 3.2 liter. I know of a guy with a 3.6 making 420+ rwhp. To get much above that requires custom pistons. I think that the block and crank are good for 600 crank hp. Actually going with the small bores of the 3.0l start to be advantageous because of cylinder wall thickness.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portsmouth, NH
Posts: 1,559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
none
No better no worse. You've got the coolest setup with the 5.5 w202. Post up some pictures of the beast. I wouldn't second guess that ride for a minute, hell I'll buy you a W124 just to trade.
#22
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
Really the only substantial difference between 124 and the 202 is the front suspension and wheel arches as far as the chassis is concerned. Cosmetically the 124 is harder. Just not very much available to get a good look. The biggest thing for me is the wheel arches. It is just impossible to get wheels and tires to fit the car without the 500e fenders and custom rear arches.
Besides it is plenty easy to get a 202 with a m104. c280, c36, or just transplant one.
The great thing about the m104 is they are cheap to repl. and tough as nails. Also the early 202 and 124 are easier to go full standalone injection and still have the rest of the car work. Especially no traction control.
Besides it is plenty easy to get a 202 with a m104. c280, c36, or just transplant one.
The great thing about the m104 is they are cheap to repl. and tough as nails. Also the early 202 and 124 are easier to go full standalone injection and still have the rest of the car work. Especially no traction control.
#24
Super Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes
on
20 Posts
1990 300ce supercharged and intercooled
Everything is the same on the c36 engine as a 3.2l except some internals.
So everything that I am making would bolt on. I do not want to get involved in tuning as of now. Unless I do it personally. My goal is to make something that someone can take care of that on their own with either a standalone or rising rate fpr or piggy back and some injectors. I am fairly sure that up to about 6lbs of boost could be handled with larger injectors and maybe some minor fuel pressure increase. '97 and newer cars would not be a problem with the throttle linkage as they have the 722.6, making it possible to put the throttle actuator in front were there is plenty of room. I have been thinking about the transmission cable problem on the older cars and am working on a design.
So everything that I am making would bolt on. I do not want to get involved in tuning as of now. Unless I do it personally. My goal is to make something that someone can take care of that on their own with either a standalone or rising rate fpr or piggy back and some injectors. I am fairly sure that up to about 6lbs of boost could be handled with larger injectors and maybe some minor fuel pressure increase. '97 and newer cars would not be a problem with the throttle linkage as they have the 722.6, making it possible to put the throttle actuator in front were there is plenty of room. I have been thinking about the transmission cable problem on the older cars and am working on a design.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In search of W222
Everything is the same on the c36 engine as a 3.2l except some internals.
So everything that I am making would bolt on. I do not want to get involved in tuning as of now. Unless I do it personally. My goal is to make something that someone can take care of that on their own with either a standalone or rising rate fpr or piggy back and some injectors. I am fairly sure that up to about 6lbs of boost could be handled with larger injectors and maybe some minor fuel pressure increase. '97 and newer cars would not be a problem with the throttle linkage as they have the 722.6, making it possible to put the throttle actuator in front were there is plenty of room. I have been thinking about the transmission cable problem on the older cars and am working on a design.
So everything that I am making would bolt on. I do not want to get involved in tuning as of now. Unless I do it personally. My goal is to make something that someone can take care of that on their own with either a standalone or rising rate fpr or piggy back and some injectors. I am fairly sure that up to about 6lbs of boost could be handled with larger injectors and maybe some minor fuel pressure increase. '97 and newer cars would not be a problem with the throttle linkage as they have the 722.6, making it possible to put the throttle actuator in front were there is plenty of room. I have been thinking about the transmission cable problem on the older cars and am working on a design.
I would Buy this kit In July probably, if u make multiple kits