NEW G-class breaks cover!!
#1
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2014 C250 sport
NEW G-class breaks cover!!
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ne.promo.4.*#4
some parts look photoshopped, doesn't look rugged and military enough to be a G-class, I think
some parts look photoshopped, doesn't look rugged and military enough to be a G-class, I think
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
![naughty](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
![tard](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tard.gif)
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
Last edited by akbro93704; 04-01-2005 at 07:57 PM.
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Looks a bit too much like its cousin, the Chrysler Pacifica; but some folks say that "Incest is best".
#4
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Conch Republic
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 Range Rover, '06 M5, '66 2CV....I wanna SMART ForTwo Conv.
They should not call it a "G".........it doesn't even remotely resemble one, nor will it be built like one.
#5
Super Member
Originally Posted by Reefminis
...it doesn't even remotely resemble one, nor will it be built like one.
quite a few G's on the dealers lot that only movement they see is for the random test drive..
#7
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Conch Republic
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 Range Rover, '06 M5, '66 2CV....I wanna SMART ForTwo Conv.
I had an '02 G and absolutely loved it apart from the fact it rode about as bad as my 911 on the pathetic Miami-Dade side of the road I use out of the Keys (not that I even expected the thing to ride like other air-suspended SUV's).
Now, instead of the '06 CLS55 I have on order I'm thinking about either an '05 G55 or an '05 Cayenne TT.............I wouldn't slap a hog on its backside for the new "G". But hey, unfortunately thats the name of the game these days. As much as I disagree with MB calling this thing a G-Class, its akin to Hummer calling the H2 a Hummer, BMW calling the MINI a Mini, and Pontiac calling the Holden Monaro a GTO. Most people just don't care about history and the name of the game is brand recognition. Not much we can do.
As ugly as it is, I'm sure the new "G" will be a nice driving truck.......I just don't think I'd ever buy one.
Now, instead of the '06 CLS55 I have on order I'm thinking about either an '05 G55 or an '05 Cayenne TT.............I wouldn't slap a hog on its backside for the new "G". But hey, unfortunately thats the name of the game these days. As much as I disagree with MB calling this thing a G-Class, its akin to Hummer calling the H2 a Hummer, BMW calling the MINI a Mini, and Pontiac calling the Holden Monaro a GTO. Most people just don't care about history and the name of the game is brand recognition. Not much we can do.
As ugly as it is, I'm sure the new "G" will be a nice driving truck.......I just don't think I'd ever buy one.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XLR
I wouldn't buy the G55 unless it was at substantial loss to the person selling it. I've driven both and after choosing the Porsche I have to say the Cayenne Turbo is king! Once those turbo's kick in it seems to make it's own gravity propelling you forward. And the ride height is fully adjustable, the suspension is set up so you can select from three different ride types comfort, normal and sport. The G55 maybe a little faster with it's blown engine in the straights but that’s about the only thing. The ride is so rough even if there isn't a hint of wiggle in that chassis. I don’t mean to bash the G55 it looks OK for a car that was designed in 1979!!!!
#9
Super Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: oregon
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2011 C300
Now, instead of the '06 CLS55 I have on order I'm thinking about either an '05 G55 or an '05 Cayenne TT.............I wouldn't slap a hog on its backside for the new "G". But hey, unfortunately thats the name of the game these days. As much as I disagree with MB calling this thing a G-Class, its akin to Hummer calling the H2 a Hummer, BMW calling the MINI a Mini, and Pontiac calling the Holden Monaro a GTO. Most people just don't care about history and the name of the game is brand recognition. Not much we can do.<--Quote : Reefminis
So true, so true,...suck's really, but the majority of the market is so gullible now. I studied all the German makes, and others when I was growing up(not that ive actually grown up yet) for fun, collected toys, fooled the 1800#'s into sending me literature,...That holden was also an Opel sedan 1995-97, who's existence was obscure in the US until 97 when the caddy that zig's arrived.
I do appreciate that the Mercedes heritage is still obvious in all the cars, though. At least to my eye.
So true, so true,...suck's really, but the majority of the market is so gullible now. I studied all the German makes, and others when I was growing up(not that ive actually grown up yet) for fun, collected toys, fooled the 1800#'s into sending me literature,...That holden was also an Opel sedan 1995-97, who's existence was obscure in the US until 97 when the caddy that zig's arrived.
![crazy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/crazy.gif)
Last edited by JDM; 04-07-2005 at 04:26 PM.