








Modified SL55 AMG vs. BMW M6
But look, I'll race and all fine-- but do NOT expect me to post up the video. :p
Last edited by blackbenzz; Nov 2, 2005 at 08:27 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
To tell you the truth, I'd be willing to take on any 55 or maybe try for a 65 just for kicks. And yes John, this includes your POS.
thats what the mag said not me, u have it so y dont u look at it? truth hurts?
a comfy benz w/ auto spanking
a 280000 exotic "Bahahahahahahaha"i think its down to aero, the murci is very wide, just a guess
thats what the mag said not me, u have it so y dont u look at it? truth hurts?
a comfy benz w/ auto spanking
a 280000 exotic "Bahahahahahahaha"i think its down to aero, the murci is very wide, just a guess
thats what the mag said not me, u have it so y dont u look at it? truth hurts?
a comfy benz w/ auto spanking
a 280000 exotic "Bahahahahahahaha"i think its down to aero, the murci is very wide, just a guess
BTW: I figured out what you were talking about. I'm sorry, I had sigs disabled and I haven't even look at mine in... Going out on a limb here. 3 1/2 months maybe. Anyways, what would you like to know?

Now I know why the SL55 driver was burning out at the end. It's what you call a victory dance. Any fool knows that the AMG is more vunerable on the low end because of the weight, and hell to deal with from a roll and at the top end.
Next time you make a promo and you need a 65 to blow away when you really get serious, just holla, and big daddy will be there
Last edited by DBERRY7578; Nov 2, 2005 at 09:55 PM.
Now I know why the SL55 driver was burning out at the end. It's what you call a victory dance. Any fool knows that the AMG is more vunerable on the low end because of the weight, and hell to deal with from a roll and at the top end.
Next time you make a promo and you need a 65 to blow away when you really get serious, just holla, and big daddy will be there

As I pointed out: three instrumented 1/4 mile tests that I'm aware of have been done on the M5. The fastest was a 12.5. The fastest E55 test so far was a 12.3, the CLS55, a 12.4. We'll see how it goes when they start testing them here, but the data thus far does not in any way, shape, or form indicate a blowout.
Click here to enjoy:
Now, would you still like to talk **** about what an M5/6 will do against a modded AMG?
2nd: The R-GT IS NOT Street Legal in anyway shape or form-- I've not only read about it in MLE (Modified Luxury & Exotics), but I've seen the blasted thing run around Limerock against Ferrari and Corvettes.
My comparo is valid.
2) your comparison is definitely valid, but my order of cars is Italian>German>Japanese Exotics>American Exotics>Others (except for Konigsegg and other rare exceptions)
Also, to me the M6 video seems rigged not because of anything Gustav did (which may or may not be true) but because a race beginning at high speeds and going to triple digit speeds is automatically going to favor the M6 because these new BMW V10s outperform the older MB V8K's at high speed. If you raced from 0 i bet you would see a different result. Also, i like the new V10, but really, if its only better at "go straight to jail" speeds, what good is it? I do the occasional high speed run (what high speed runs my 320 will do anyways) but i tend to keep total speed below 80 because i like having a license, if i was just buying something that i could punch hard at mid range speeds or tear off from a stoplight from, the V10's peak performance area over the 55 engine would be irrelevant. Just an opinion though, based on my driving style.
As I pointed out: three instrumented 1/4 mile tests that I'm aware of have been done on the M5. The fastest was a 12.5. The fastest E55 test so far was a 12.3, the CLS55, a 12.4. We'll see how it goes when they start testing them here, but the data thus far does not in any way, shape, or form indicate a blowout.
but they show from a roll the the M5/6 are faster than their AMG counterparts as the speed increases. The videos make no suggestion that from a standstill the AMG cars will be trounced, the trap speeds of the M's are a few mph faster than their AMG equivalent which to me is supported by the videos). Just accept the facts and stop being a **** stirrer.

Not only does he always manage to tick off our fellow E55 owners, but he manages to get under everyone elses skin with this ridiculous trolling-trip he's on.
It is funny though, regarding the video, when suddenly the SL starts to pull-- we hear dear Gustav damn near yelping like a little pansy and than-- BLACK, and the vehicles are side by side once more. A bit suspicious... "Oh ****," was right, this race is about as valid and trustworthy, as using Paris Hilton when phoning a friend.
I hope to god at one of these meets I get a chance to run into one of these overrated (and ugly) BMWs. I'll show them what Mercedes is all about, fairly.
I, for the life of me, cannot understand how trolls-- yes, you, Gustav-- are allowed to freely screw up our community over here, yet when a stupid remark is made by one of our own (Gee, I don't know... Tuscanraider?), the member is banned.
Gustav, seriously, I think I speak for a majority of MBWorld members when I say:
Leave.
YI fastest 0-200 km/h with M6 with LC is 12,8 s.
As I pointed out: three instrumented 1/4 mile tests that I'm aware of have been done on the M5. The fastest was a 12.5. The fastest E55 test so far was a 12.3, the CLS55, a 12.4. We'll see how it goes when they start testing them here, but the data thus far does not in any way, shape, or form indicate a blowout.

but they show from a roll the the M5/6 are faster than their AMG counterparts as the speed increases. The videos make no suggestion that from a standstill the AMG cars will be trounced, the trap speeds of the M's are a few mph faster than their AMG equivalent which to me is supported by the videos). Just accept the facts and stop being a **** stirrer. 







Was wondering who would catch that.