W211 AMG Discuss the W211 AMG's such as the E55 and the E63
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Looking for evidence why this intake is not better than stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-29-2009, 12:14 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Juice1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
E550
Looking for evidence why this intake is not better than stock

I put this intake together from some pieces I had laying around and what to get some info from those who have dyno/track tested or even runs a similar setup. I know many are concerned this intake will take in hotter air from the engine bay but once the car is moving I think the iat's will be close to stock as there will be plenty of air coming thru the grill area. I also know that this intake will definitely dyno higher than stock as most dyno their cars with the hood open.

I have alot of experiences with american v8's both N/A and FI as im sure others on here do. In almost all cases intake setups like these outperform stock setups on both the dyno and track. Im curious as to why it would be different on this car?

I have been driving around with it on my car for a couple of days and cannot notice a performance difference from stock. Could just be that the butt dyno isnt calibrated sensitively enough. With as much power as these cars make a gain of 10whp would be hard pressed to feel. The only noticable difference is the much more pronounced supercharger whine.

Any input from tuners would be much appreciated as well..Thanks

...yes the stock filters are removed...


Last edited by Juice1979; 06-29-2009 at 12:34 AM.
Old 06-29-2009, 01:29 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
AZIPOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NorCal
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W211,E90,E66,E39,E38,NSX,Z32-TT
With 500+ HP, any gains from air filters you will need be able to tell or accurate tell with a butt dyno. I think the only real way is to do a pre/post test-run on a dyno.

How does it sound? Is there a deep sound when the engine is under load? If there's a down side to this I would have to say its the heat underneath the hood.
Old 06-29-2009, 02:07 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
i dont think you will see larger numbers on the dyno. it seems more of a ram style intake or cold air intake. if you could some how do a dyno when you were actually moving, and compare before and after install, you might see something. i dont think a fan or two can replicate the volume of air that can fly into the engine bay at high speeds so you might not be able to see results you like on a dyno.
Old 06-29-2009, 02:57 AM
  #4  
acb
Super Member
 
acb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane, Aust
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 e55 amg
I could look at your sig all day jurkel
Old 06-29-2009, 03:39 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jturkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,856
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
02 C32 AMG
Originally Posted by acb
I could look at your sig all day jurkel
lol.... i do. thats probably why i never got off mbworld. i'm on here all frickin day haha.
Old 06-29-2009, 03:53 AM
  #6  
acb
Super Member
 
acb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brisbane, Aust
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 e55 amg
it would be one disadvatange of flat-badging your car - licking that just wouldnt have the same effect
Old 06-29-2009, 05:50 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Wryfox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona Beach
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 E55 AMG
Here's why no gains. You've traded a flat filter for round but basically same filter area. no net advantage. You've traded colder front grille air for hot engine air, particularly air that has already passed your radiators, let alone radiant heat from engine. The air slipping in through various openings in front of car won't make up for that.The only thing you have really done is shorten the air path by maybe 8 inches in an intake path that is something like 6 ft long before it gets to the cylinder. BUT, it does look cooler!

Last edited by Wryfox; 06-29-2009 at 05:53 AM.
Old 06-29-2009, 09:30 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Juice1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
E550
I understand why everyone thinks this may or may not be benficial, but i was hoping there would have been someone on here with real data to share...hopefully some of the tuners can chime in here
Old 06-29-2009, 09:40 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
iconoclast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In, Out & Around...
Posts: 548
Received 52 Likes on 40 Posts
Audi BMW Ferrari MB & RR
what data specifically are you looking for? noone is going to dyno before/after open element filter install... but more importantly the amount of hot air you would be sucking in with those filters is unreal. theres a reason why so many well paid engineers designed what they did.
Old 06-29-2009, 10:06 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Juice1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
E550
Originally Posted by iconoclast
what data specifically are you looking for? noone is going to dyno before/after open element filter install... but more importantly the amount of hot air you would be sucking in with those filters is unreal. theres a reason why so many well paid engineers designed what they did.
Do you really think that on a vehicle in motion the iat's are that much higher with my current filter location (6 inch difference) than with the stock setup. I am pretty sure that once the vehicle is moving that the air passing thru the front grill etc will be the same temp as stock. I know there was a thread recently posted by "sneakyneon" (i beleive) where he tested IAT temps with various different setups. If i remember correctly IAT's seemed unaffected with stock intake scoops removed.
Old 06-29-2009, 10:47 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
itsmeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: D.C. METRO AREA
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nissan GT-R cobb/midpipe/ic piping/wastegate actuators/tials
Because you're taking hot air from the engine bay rather then cold air from outside.
Old 06-29-2009, 11:38 AM
  #12  
Super Member
 
TopEndS62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY/Tampa, FL
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 BLK/BLK E-Double Nickel.
also that chrome piping will raise air temperature....
Old 06-29-2009, 11:49 AM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by Juice1979
I understand why everyone thinks this may or may not be benficial, but i was hoping there would have been someone on here with real data to share...hopefully some of the tuners can chime in here
any reason why you can't dyno and simply report your own findings?
Old 06-29-2009, 12:31 PM
  #14  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Taking it to the track and swapping setups between runs would be your best indicator of whether it works well or not
Old 06-29-2009, 12:35 PM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
lowprofile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
E55
^ I agree. Track results are the way to go if you want real world answers.
Old 06-29-2009, 12:45 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Hammer Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 4,275
Received 28 Likes on 25 Posts
2015 E63S, 2018 E63S
Originally Posted by Juice1979
I put this intake together from some pieces I had laying around and what to get some info from those who have dyno/track tested or even runs a similar setup. I know many are concerned this intake will take in hotter air from the engine bay but once the car is moving I think the iat's will be close to stock as there will be plenty of air coming thru the grill area. I also know that this intake will definitely dyno higher than stock as most dyno their cars with the hood open.

I have alot of experiences with american v8's both N/A and FI as im sure others on here do. In almost all cases intake setups like these outperform stock setups on both the dyno and track. Im curious as to why it would be different on this car?

I have been driving around with it on my car for a couple of days and cannot notice a performance difference from stock. Could just be that the butt dyno isnt calibrated sensitively enough. With as much power as these cars make a gain of 10whp would be hard pressed to feel. The only noticable difference is the much more pronounced supercharger whine.

Any input from tuners would be much appreciated as well..Thanks

...yes the stock filters are removed...

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...g-results.html

Is this what you are looking for?
Old 06-29-2009, 12:53 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
bassn_07's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2006 E55 AMG
I also agree. If you dyno your car with this setup could you please do both with the hood open and shut. With this type of system you would definitely benefit from the hood being open but you wouldn't see these same type of condition during normal driving. The intake would have endless amounts of ambient temperature air with no engine heat. Just a thought for testing.
Old 06-29-2009, 01:09 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by blackbenzz
Taking it to the track and swapping setups between runs would be your best indicator of whether it works well or not
you know I totally agree but my point is why go through the labor of doing the mod then get lazy and ask others for info regarding it's benefits...finish the project properly by obtaining and sharing your own objective data!
Old 06-29-2009, 01:29 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Juice1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
E550
Originally Posted by chiromikey
any reason why you can't dyno and simply report your own findings?
Of course I could but I was hoping that someone would have already tried this and had some results they could share
Old 06-29-2009, 01:55 PM
  #20  
Former Vendor of MBWorld
 
Autoscope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E350 Sport & Rs6
Someone said it....

Colder CFM is better than MORE CFM........

Especially on the SC cars....

Does it heat soak real fast? I bet it growls more....
Old 06-29-2009, 02:00 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Yacht Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Caribbean/Florida/Colorado
Posts: 3,642
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
E-ZGO 53hp., 1999 E 430 sport, 2004 E 55, 2008 Tahoe LTZ on 24"s
Doctor says you have K&Nitis.

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ntake-55s.html

And a little more refined effort here,

https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-benefits.html

Last edited by Yacht Master; 06-29-2009 at 02:14 PM.
Old 06-29-2009, 02:50 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Juice1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts
E550
Originally Posted by Adam@Autoscope
Someone said it....

Colder CFM is better than MORE CFM........

Especially on the SC cars....

Does it heat soak real fast? I bet it growls more....

I plan on taking it to the track and swapping to the stock setup for sameday comparisons.

No noticeable heat soak, however, I dont drive that much and the few days that it has been installed have not been terribly hot.

Definitely growls alot more than stock!
Old 06-29-2009, 05:30 PM
  #23  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Thericker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern, CA.
Posts: 9,155
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
V12-Biturbo
Try this, my post from Mushroom Filter thread...

I totally agreed w/both you guys, I always thought these types of kits were crap, but done my way works, I tested it back to back same day vs same car on 12 tot dif runs/races pre-post mod = multi car length gains...

MAIN differences in my choices are, ditch the equiped metal pipes (they're just heat sinks) w/supplied silcone couplers (Ebay kit) you can use existing plastic tubes, the supplied Foam Cones are better than K&N or other Cone type variants because they're wrapped in folded metal/weave/mesh which = more Heat Sinks.

Lastly you have to DREMEL OUT the plastic walls inside the factory airboxes, there are multi-90 deg bends/plastic wall-restrictions routing air-flow due to OEM filter placement, once removed it's straight thru ram air...

I have 1 more idea that may improve it even more (I'm testing it this wknd) that basically encapsulates the new Foam Cones w/bigger 5"-6" diam flexi-plastic tube routed directly to factory holes then C-clamped in place so NO hot engine air mixing...
Link to kit I used, http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Merce...Q5fAccessories NOTE: toss out the metal pipes! these filters flow so much more cold air vs K&N, just holding them in your hand shoot compressed air thru each type w/other hand feeling air exiting other side of filters dif is HUGE! Also after driving for few minutes the K&N metal weave type heat-up like crazy vs Foam Only Cones after driving 2 hrs in traffic they're cool to touch, lastly I wanted to see if my new set-up was letting fine dust inside airboxes? after 3 wks use I opened up both sides they were sparkling clean, vs stock OEM set-up there would be heavy sand/little rocks on the bottom of boxes under OEM filters.

These Foam Cone filters STOP any of those foreign contaminants from ever entering airboxes. I checked my stock OEM set-up regularly, the rock/sand build up would be their in few wks, just imagine how clogged up & further air restricted this makes OEM set-up?

Last edited by Thericker; 06-29-2009 at 05:53 PM.
Old 06-29-2009, 06:06 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
chiromikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,649
Received 207 Likes on 157 Posts
'03 E55, Range Rover Sport Supercharged, Ducati 748R
Originally Posted by Thericker
I wanted to see if my new set-up was letting fine dust inside airboxes? after 3 wks use I opened up both sides they were sparkling clean, vs stock OEM set-up there would be heavy sand/little rocks on the bottom of boxes under OEM filters....These Foam Cone filters STOP any of those foreign contaminants from ever entering airboxes. I checked my stock OEM set-up regularly, the rock/sand build up would be their in few wks, just imagine how clogged up & further air restricted this makes OEM set-up?
think about what you're saying. the reason you used to find that debris in the bottom of your airbox is because the filters were doing their job!!!!! do you really think that new filer is that good or is it likely that now instead of staying trapped in the airbox the dust and debris is going straight into the motor?

Last edited by chiromikey; 06-29-2009 at 06:11 PM.
Old 06-29-2009, 06:34 PM
  #25  
Out Of Control!!
 
blackbenzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,487
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
haters crazy
Originally Posted by chiromikey
you know I totally agree but my point is why go through the labor of doing the mod then get lazy and ask others for info regarding it's benefits...finish the project properly by obtaining and sharing your own objective data!
Word, I know.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Looking for evidence why this intake is not better than stock



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.