Looking for evidence why this intake is not better than stock
I have alot of experiences with american v8's both N/A and FI as im sure others on here do. In almost all cases intake setups like these outperform stock setups on both the dyno and track. Im curious as to why it would be different on this car?
I have been driving around with it on my car for a couple of days and cannot notice a performance difference from stock. Could just be that the butt dyno isnt calibrated sensitively enough. With as much power as these cars make a gain of 10whp would be hard pressed to feel. The only noticable difference is the much more pronounced supercharger whine.
Any input from tuners would be much appreciated as well..Thanks

...yes the stock filters are removed...
Last edited by Juice1979; Jun 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM.
How does it sound? Is there a deep sound when the engine is under load? If there's a down side to this I would have to say its the heat underneath the hood.
Last edited by Wryfox; Jun 29, 2009 at 05:53 AM.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




I have alot of experiences with american v8's both N/A and FI as im sure others on here do. In almost all cases intake setups like these outperform stock setups on both the dyno and track. Im curious as to why it would be different on this car?
I have been driving around with it on my car for a couple of days and cannot notice a performance difference from stock. Could just be that the butt dyno isnt calibrated sensitively enough. With as much power as these cars make a gain of 10whp would be hard pressed to feel. The only noticable difference is the much more pronounced supercharger whine.
Any input from tuners would be much appreciated as well..Thanks

...yes the stock filters are removed...

Is this what you are looking for?
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...ntake-55s.html
And a little more refined effort here,
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...-benefits.html
Last edited by Yacht Master; Jun 29, 2009 at 02:14 PM.
I plan on taking it to the track and swapping to the stock setup for sameday comparisons.
No noticeable heat soak, however, I dont drive that much and the few days that it has been installed have not been terribly hot.
Definitely growls alot more than stock!
MAIN differences in my choices are, ditch the equiped metal pipes (they're just heat sinks) w/supplied silcone couplers (Ebay kit) you can use existing plastic tubes, the supplied Foam Cones are better than K&N or other Cone type variants because they're wrapped in folded metal/weave/mesh which = more Heat Sinks.
Lastly you have to DREMEL OUT the plastic walls inside the factory airboxes, there are multi-90 deg bends/plastic wall-restrictions routing air-flow due to OEM filter placement, once removed it's straight thru ram air...
I have 1 more idea that may improve it even more (I'm testing it this wknd) that basically encapsulates the new Foam Cones w/bigger 5"-6" diam flexi-plastic tube routed directly to factory holes then C-clamped in place so NO hot engine air mixing...
These Foam Cone filters STOP any of those foreign contaminants from ever entering airboxes. I checked my stock OEM set-up regularly, the rock/sand build up would be their in few wks, just imagine how clogged up & further air restricted this makes OEM set-up?
Last edited by Thericker; Jun 29, 2009 at 05:53 PM.
Last edited by chiromikey; Jun 29, 2009 at 06:11 PM.






