A "yeah, right" thread on the BMW M5 race stories forum:
As I said: it's quite obvious that keyboard racing and smack talking is all you do.
0If it has to be done at the track and it will be videotaped, I will have my friend drive my car since he is an experienced track driver. Does Improviz offer still stand that my car cannot break into the 12's?
As I said: it's quite obvious that keyboard racing and smack talking is all you do.
I repeat: $500 for any verified win/tie by you in a stock or lightly modded M5 against a supercharged CL55 at a strip (presumably Moroso).
And I'll even add to the offer: if you can run a certified 12.6 at Moroso, I'll also give you $500. This, of course, would be on street tires, without the fronts pumped up to 90psi, witnessed and verified by Miami C55 and/or SGC, yadda yadda...
Put up, or shut up.

Last edited by Improviz; Jan 28, 2005 at 10:57 AM.
That means, you gave us your word, twice, to go to Moroso.
And then, you backed out.
This means that you made a promise twice, and then broke it.
First time:
If you want to go to Moroso one night, e-mail me.
Stop wasting our time, and show up. You keep talking, but for some reason, you keep avoiding the "real world" of Moroso and instead insist on repeated ruses and diversions to try and mask this fact. Talk is cheap!
I repeat: when are you going to Moroso??
Here are enzom and Benzo's posts, where he had called you to go to Moroso, and you told him you "might" show, but did not.
Before I deal with you any more, I want an explanation: you claimed yesterday that you never "backed out" of anything. What do you call this?
Last edited by Improviz; Jan 28, 2005 at 11:23 AM.
The offer was not that your car can break into the 12's; it was this:
Did you see that: YOU to repeat what YOU claim to have done. That, my perpetually lying, squirming friend, was the offer. And you rejected it. Repeatedly. Because, as has been repeatedly established here, you're nothing more than a keyboard racer and a troll.
So set it up. Go to the other thread on the E55 forum, where you first agreed to show and then balked, and set it up. As many times as you've lied to everyone over there, I doubt they'll even bother with you anymore, but who knows? Maybe they'll give you one more chance.

The Best of Mercedes & AMG
That means, you gave us your word, twice, to go to Moroso.
And then, you backed out.
This means that you made a promise twice, and then broke it.
First time:
Second time:
You made a promise, twice. You broke it. Which makes you a liar. And an especially despicable one at that, given the amount of time you spent insulting AMG owners for "not having the sack" to show when I first proposed this race.
Here are enzom and Benzo's posts, where he had called you to go to Moroso, and you told him you "might" show, but did not.
Liar.
Before I deal with you any more, I want an explanation: you claimed yesterday that you never "backed out" of anything. What do you call this?
You promised to go SEVEN TIMES!!!
First time:
If you want to go to Moroso one night, e-mail me.
Second time:
I will do my best!!!
Fourth time:
Fifth time:
Stop wasting our time, and show up. You keep talking, but for some reason, you keep avoiding the "real world" of Moroso and instead insist on repeated ruses and diversions to try and mask this fact. Talk is cheap!
I repeat: when are you going to Moroso??
I am gonna go to the track but I have exams all week for school. I didn't go last week because of a problem that I told SGC about. The only thing about the track is that I am most likely not going to put up times that equate to my car's potential right off the bat because I have never gone to the track before. I am going to have to get used to it then put up times that equate to my car's actual performance. I think this is understandable
Sixth time:
Seventh time:
And finally, after all of that, when push comes to shove:
Do you realize how utterly stupid this whole affair has made you look? Why didn't you just quit while you were behind?

Six promises to go to the track, and you never once showed up, despite no fewer than five invitations from SGC and others:
First invitation:
Second invitation:
Third invitation:
Fourth invitation:
Fifth invitation:
What's funny is that all of the "AMG wimps" and "little old ladies" whom you accused of "not having the sack" to show up all showed up, dude....where were you?

You are pathetic.
Last edited by Improviz; Jan 28, 2005 at 12:41 PM.
This is like challenging someone to a fight, and then having a ringer fight for you.
Have you no integrity whatsoever???
Be a man for once and keep your word for once!!
This is like challenging someone to a fight, and then having a ringer fight for you.
Have you no integrity whatsoever???
Be a man for once and keep your word for once!!
I don't think you understand how difficult it is too take a six speed to the track for the first time in your life and run a time close to what your car is capable of. You need to get some runs in and get a feel for the timing.

Excuses, excuses..."timing" does't mean diddly. The runs are timed from the moment YOUR CAR moves, not from the green light. In other words, if you wait three seconds after the green light and then run a 12.6 second 1/4 mile, your slip will read a 12.6 second 1/4 mile. The reaction time is noted separately, and is not included in the time your car runs, idiot. You're just making excuses, as you've been doing for three months now, because you don't have the sack to show up at the track, because you know good and well that your story was nothing but a load of BS, like I've been saying all along. What a loser.
So, are you going to show up at the track like you've promised seven times now, loser?
Last edited by Improviz; Jan 28, 2005 at 02:46 PM.

So when are you going to show up at the track like you promised seven times?
Last edited by Improviz; Jan 28, 2005 at 02:50 PM.
Excuses, excuses..."timing" does't mean diddly. The runs are timed from the moment YOUR CAR moves, not from the green light. In other words, if you wait three seconds after the green light and then run a 12.6 second 1/4 mile, your slip will read a 12.6 second 1/4 mile. The reaction time is noted separately, and is not included in the time your car runs, idiot. You're just making excuses, as you've been doing for three months now, because you don't have the sack to show up at the track, because you know good and well that your story was nothing but a load of BS, like I've been saying all along. What a loser.
So, are you going to show up at the track like you've promised seven times now, loser?
Are you going to show up at Moroso and run, with you driving as originally promised, or not?
I don't think you understand how difficult it is too take a six speed to the track for the first time in your life and run a time close to what your car is capable of. You need to get some runs in and get a feel for the timing.

That you won't even try for fear of embarassment is sad.
We've been through this multiple times, APK...as proved in the above thread, the CL55 weighs 167 pounds more than the E55. It has the same engine, although in the CL55 it is rated at 493 horsepower, while in the E55 it is rated at 469. The two cars share the same transmission, with the same gearing, the same rear axle ratio. IF the CL55 does in fact put out 24 more horsepower than the E55, then the horsepower gain would more than offset the weight gain, and it too could run a 12.0 with the right driver. Even IF the two cars put out exactly the same horsepower, than the CL55 would be about 0.17 slower (as Hot Rod magazine proved here, each 100 pounds lost = one tenth gained in the 1/4 mile), meaning that it could run a 12.17. You couldn't touch that in your M5 on a good day, and you damn sure couldn't beat it to 110 mph as you originally claimed, liar.
And, as shown to you here and on about another dozen occasions, they've been tested at the same rate in the 1/4 mile. You got scared like a little girl and **** your pants when you found out that E55's are running 12.0's, immediately after which you started making excuses not to go to the track despite having promised to go seven times, but guess what? NONE of the mags have tested E55's at a 12.0. But when cars get broken in they get faster (here's proof), and when good drivers figure out how to get good launches out of traction-limited cars, they can add a few tenths.
i.e., just like the E55 the CL55 is capable of a faster time than the 12.4 Motor Trend tested it at.
But there's one way to prove it: a CL55 already agreed to meet you at Moroso. Remember that?
But oh, that's right: once the CL55, the car you claimed to have beaten, agreed to show up at Moroso, you wimped out and refused to show.
So, are you ever going to show up at Moroso like you promised to do, seven times, APK?
Pathetic.




Also, Mercedes really under rates these Kompressed engines. See the dyno of my 2003 CL55 here:
https://mbworld.org/forums/cl55-amg-cl65-amg-cl63-amg-c215-c216/91764-dyno-run.html

And hey, it's kind of fun to slap him around.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthread.php?t=91764
Heck, even his fellow M5 owners (and our own M&M, no Mercedes fan) were telling him he'd get killed.
Last edited by Improviz; Jan 29, 2005 at 01:09 PM.


