Project Chrome Dome Part 2.1
This is how I've enjoyed it for the last year. In case anyone missed it, I've added the links. https://mbworld.org/forums/clk55-amg-clk63-amg-w208-w209/167426-project-chrome-dome.html

Then I've added a actual closed CLK 320 factory airbox with a K&N flat panel for testing purposes. The complete factory look without the dual snorkel AMG 55 box.

Well the Chrome Dome manifold is on the floor again. I am exploring my new idea for a hot air intake. I've been cutting and grinding and it's getting there!

Here's the sneak preview. Watch out brother, she's gonna blow
........
...........
................
...................
......................
.............................
.................................
.......................................
Rich
Last edited by mbenzman; Oct 4, 2007 at 12:50 AM.
Last edited by blackbenzz; Oct 4, 2007 at 10:06 AM.
Trending Topics
Good to meet another envelope pusher!! Your wheel is on the way.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Anyway it should still be cool when running, This week if I have my way.
Here's a link to him talking about it.
https://mbworld.org/forums/showthrea...pressor&page=2

, lots of cutting, welding, splicing and reengineering to make every thing fit and work the way I wanted. It's ALIVE
I started it tonight and the first couple drives were horrible, but the tuning is going very well and after it went sideways from a roll, I believe I have created a real monster. Then my radiator hose blew and ended the fun I was just starting to enjoy.
At least the wheel I purchased from jangy showed up earlier 
That AMG blower is in good company under that hood, iridium plugs, high flow seperate i/c circuit with a real pressure cap/reservoir, engine full of evans coolant and cool thermostat, and phenolic blower intake spacers to name a few items of interest. It's wagging it's tail all over the block.
It's a blast! Using VP race gas for tuning insurance right now.Don't envy me, just send me your toy to mod.
Thanks.
Split Second MAF/Timing adjustment along with FMU? Chip?
One thing I found is that the ECU will set the MAP sensor error if you run boost for a while. You will see with a Check Engine light at some point.
Unless you are playing with the ECU you will need to handle this.
I used a 2.9V Zenor Diode to clamp the voltage. 2.9V allows for about any altitude, but keeps low enough so that the ECU does not think the sensor is bad.
I am now working on a DAQ unit to watch for detonation. I have the Mercedes profiles.
Split Second MAF/Timing adjustment along with FMU? Chip?
One thing I found is that the ECU will set the MAP sensor error if you run boost for a while. You will see with a Check Engine light at some point.
Unless you are playing with the ECU you will need to handle this.
I used a 2.9V Zenor Diode to clamp the voltage. 2.9V allows for about any altitude, but keeps low enough so that the ECU does not think the sensor is bad.
I am now working on a DAQ unit to watch for detonation. I have the Mercedes profiles.
I haven't cruised down the road yet, just down the block. I'm not calling this done yet!
Greg, you have a completely different setup from mine. For instance the pcv hoses I hook up with factory parts for the Kompressor setup. My throttle body is still about in the same place, and the tank ventilation and brake booster line hook right up using the Kompressor parts (no the w211 doesn't have vacuum brakes but the hookup is there
I also have the factory intercooler functional and it's hopped up. I have some options on tuning if the need arises. I am not running a fmu as with the larger injectors I haven't had a lean problem, I've been removing fuel.
I haven't had any detonation, but I have a load of ultra high octane vp race gas to prevent it while I check the tune. I appreciate the input and love what you've done with yours and will take note of any advice. Thanks.

So if the romans were to put a number on how much boost you are running, what woud that number be? Great work, i'm really impressed
Last edited by blackbenzz; Oct 16, 2007 at 10:01 PM.

So if the romans were to put a number on how much boost you are running, what woud that number be? Great work, i'm really impressed
I do reserve the right to change directions, and I haven't said I'm done or this is the way to go yet. If it doesn't work out the way I want, I can see if a custom tune can be dropped on the ecu, or drop the normal clk55 injectors back in, a fmu and do it the Kleemann way or the split second unit may be the way to go. I'm not there yet. I can also lower the boost on this by bleeding off the boost at the bypass.
Your boost limitation is going to be set by your belt. It will not take the strain. You will have to improve your belt drive, ask Ted Baldwin about belts. we are going to build him a new belt drive.
Last edited by mbenzman; Oct 16, 2007 at 10:12 PM.
With larger injectors over stock, the closed loop control will adjust. It is open loop that may see strange things. Most of the tables run off the Load calc. With larger injectors, the load calc is off and high. May not be a problem, but will affect those switches from closed to open loop as you go up hills.
Watch out for tip-in detonation. I had all kinds of probelms with this on the roots blown mustang I played with for a while.
It will be great to see the car on the dyno.
My powerdyne is the limit today, as its out of air flow. These 5.5L like lots of air flow. I see max 7.5-8psi. A company just came out with a new turbine, which I plan to install. I would like to see 9-9.5 psi max.
With these 11:1 compression engines we are pushing it when above about 8psi. If you go above 8 you may want to sup with a meth injection to up the relative octane.
keep us all informed. I have though a lot about jumping is the same way you did with the screww setup. Would be a fun winter project.
For my current leaning out problem, I'm thinking one of three possible directions, piggyback controller, I like the Apexi Neo, a FMU, or a complete retune, which is my preferred route right now unless forced back to the other two. I will hold right now while I am exploring this option. Here's an interesting little bit. In all the ecu exploring I've been doing, I found some menu items. It appears than M.B. had their options open by 2002 as far as possible combinations. The 2002 CLK55 ecu has the supercharger and intercooler pump control references in it including the actuations feedback. See where and why I'm heading here.
I would love to lose the maf like the kompressors.In the meantime it is finally drivable (albeit with esp blinking
) if I don't try to floor it, which like the E55K, I never have to go WOT to get my ear to ear grin everytime.
Gregg, you might rethink your not allowing the map to see boost. Mine seems to like it a whole lot better than just giving it a vacuum reference. It wanted to ping without seeing the boost, but it was a still a little too lean at that point.
BTW the fuel pump in the CLK55 is the same used on the G55 Kompressor. It has no boost or even just vacuum referenced regulator or other monkey buisness. They must just compensate for boost with injection pulse width. That's why I have tried to stay with the factory recipe, at least til roadblocks force a change. There ARE modded G55's around pushing 650 HP without starvation issues. As a matter of fact, you would be shocked at how fast A 650 hp G will drain a very large tank of 93.

So what fuel pump did you use? Specs?
Last edited by mbenzman; Oct 18, 2007 at 09:38 PM.









