2021 GLE350 Cylinder Head Failure??!!?
Replacing the cylinder head on M264 (M260 refers to the transverse configuration (for front-wheel drive models) while the M264 refers to the longitudinally mounted engine (for rear-wheel drive models)):
and on 2022 GLA-M260 engine. Diagnose and Repair the Check Engine Light - P219C77 on 2022 Mercedes Benz GLA M260 (March temp plate showing Fremont, California):
MB has had a string of bad four bangers. Something to avoid from this manufacturer.
Please keep us updated.
Last edited by chassis; Oct 19, 2022 at 09:28 PM.
However, I'll tell you why I'm disappointed. Like many of you, I've owned many, many cars of different makes. Currently, I have a 2020 GLS450 and the '21 GLE. The GLS with 17k miles has a few different quality issues, for example separating seats, which the GLE also has, a broken center console door, and some computer/software glitches that are intermittent. Engine seems fine. The GLE has 14k miles the separating MBTEX seats, and the cylinder head failure. I would expect more from a Mercedes, I would not expect more from a KIA or Hyundai, not to bash those makes. My last 12 vehicles were BMWs, with no problems. I have a 2020 Porsche 911 with 19k miles. No problems. I have a 2016 Toyota Tundra with 40k miles, no problems. I have a 2015 Lexus RX350 with 80k miles, not a single issue. In that context, I'm disappointed with my $85,000 GLS and $70k GLE. A cylinder head failure is not a minor thing from what I can tell. It's been in the shop a week so far. I hope this is the end of the issues, and the motor doesn't crap out the week after the warranty expires.





Last edited by E55Greasemonkey; Oct 19, 2022 at 05:03 PM.
However, I haven’t seen too many posts about it here about AC failures.
More and more I get the sense that there’s very little interaction with this forum. I don’t get it. Not sure if it’s the type of buyer or toxic people, but it’s crickets here versus the other German enthusiast forums.
Trending Topics

four banger = bad cylinder head
inline 6 = cracked wiring
V8 = rear main seal leak (read W213 section)
I6 and V8 are additionally subject to 48V difficulties.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG




Last edited by E55Greasemonkey; Oct 20, 2022 at 12:56 PM.
I'm a ways off from needing plugs, but will keep this in mind to tell the dealer when that comes up in a couple years. Just crossed 10k now.




Do you have personal experience? Was there a service history?












It's because I do a lot of research, I have good sources, and I want to investigate.
I don't need a link, just a source or direction. Thanks in advance.




Here’s a more serious (recent issue) at VAG with a potential recall of 74k vehicles pending.
https://www.autoevolution.com/news/v...es-201687.html
Maybe MB solved the piston cracking from the M274 and the bubble on the wallpaper is now the cylinder head and rods (coming out the side).
https://www.glaowners.com/threads/cy...0-miles.28704/
Maybe MB solved the piston cracking from the M274 and the bubble on the wallpaper is now the cylinder head and rods (coming out the side).
Last edited by Serhan; Oct 24, 2022 at 03:59 PM.
Higher bmep is an indication of higher overall operating stress. Higher operating stress + cost reduction pressure = potential for failures. High specific output is the goal for racing engines. In consumer appliances such as MB vehicles, when cost cutting enters the picture, as it always does, caveat emptor.
It is safe to assume parts bin components are shared across as many engines as possible: belt idlers and tensioners, sensors of all types: cam position, cam magnets, crank position, temperature and others. Injectors have been shared across engines, I don't know if that is the case with these engines.
MB's engine failures seem to be all over the map: cylinder scoring and other problems on M278/M157, rear main oil seal on M177, cylinder head failure on M264 and piston cracking on M274. This to me says they are pushing technology levels while not allowing the needed product cost (material quantity and quality) and not spending sufficient prototype development time and money to address problems. In the end they are skimping on time and money and the consumer is the one who pays. The MB star is further tarnished, if that were possible.
None of these engines inspire confidence in me, and we haven't started talking about the flopped EQ-boost system which still isn't sorted out almost 4 years since introduction.
Last edited by chassis; Oct 24, 2022 at 07:37 PM.




The V167 GLE 350 is well over 50% of GLE sales and over 3.5 years and more than 100,000 sold in the US alone. This is really a serious situation with .00001 cylinder head failures reported. If only 10% are reported then that means that’s a whopping .0001 failure rate. I’m not going to do the research on the other models but you get the point. No car Co. is going to cheap out on engine parts hoping to save money…the warranty cost would bury them.
I hope someday One of our members gets over his hatred for the product, poor Dealer Service or whatever fora car that he doesn’t even own. I don’t know about anyone else but I’m disappointed that adults continue to jump on any perceived issue without facts.




Higher bmep is an indication of higher overall operating stress. Higher operating stress + cost reduction pressure = potential for failures. High specific output is the goal for racing engines. In consumer appliances such as MB vehicles, when cost cutting enters the picture, as it always does, caveat emptor.
It is safe to assume parts bin components are shared across as many engines as possible: belt idlers and tensioners, sensors of all types: cam position, cam magnets, crank position, temperature and others. Injectors have been shared across engines, I don't know if that is the case with these engines.
MB's engine failures seem to be all over the map: cylinder scoring and other problems on M278/M157, rear main oil seal on M177, cylinder head failure on M264 and piston cracking on M274. This to me says they are pushing technology levels while not allowing the needed product cost (material quantity and quality) and not spending sufficient prototype development time and money to address problems. In the end they are skimping on time and money and the consumer is the one who pays. The MB star is further tarnished, if that were possible.
None of these engines inspire confidence in me, and we haven't started talking about the flopped EQ-boost system which still isn't sorted out almost 4 years since introduction.
Which affects engine stressed immensely at these specific outputs.
Lots of advancements in managing stresses and cooling, especially with 48v systems.
The new AMG 2 liter puts out 476hp. There's a lot more going on than just cylinder spacing. I don't see any reason not to trust it.
Plus, there are very few shared components between the "related" engines you talk about. Specifically, crank, rods snd pistons are not shared, according to Daimler releases. The crank is now hollow, for instance.
Just about every manufacturer has had a huge numbers of engines recalled in the last couple of years. Except Mercedes and ???
Now they're talking about relaxing to Tier Seven emission standards. Maybe that will reduce stresses more than specific output.





